Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Review article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Calcium phosphate injection of symptomatic bone marrow lesions of the knee: what is the current clinical evidence?

Knee Surgery & Related Research volume 32, Article number: 4 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chronic bone marrow lesions (BML) in the weight-bearing portions of the knee are often associated with symptomatic degenerative arthritis resulting in pain and dysfunction. Injection of bone substitute material like calcium phosphate has been described. Whilst some studies have reported encouraging results others have shown limited benefit of this technique.

Aim

The aim was to collate the available evidence on the injection of calcium phosphate and systematically evaluate the results to answer the questions encountered in clinical decision making: (1) does it provide effective long-lasting pain relief to avoid further surgical intervention? (2) which factors (patient/surgical) significantly influence the outcome? and (3) does it adversely affect the outcomes of subsequent arthroplasty?

Methods

A literature search was performed to identify the studies describing the clinical outcomes of calcium phosphate injection for treatment of BML. We evaluated the reported clinical outcomes with respect to pain, function and complications. Isolated case reports and studies with no objective assessment of clinical outcomes were excluded.

Results

We noted 46 articles in the current literature of which 8 described clinical outcomes of calcium phosphate injection. Mean (plus/minus SD) score on the visual analog scale (VAS) has been reported to improve from 7.90 (± 0.38) to 2.76 (± 0.90), whereas the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score improved from 30.5 (SD not reported (NR)) to 53.0 (SD NR). Pre and post procedure Short form survey (SF-12) scores were 29.8 (SD NR) and 36.7 (SD NR), respectively. In one study, scores on the Tegner Lysholm knee scoring scale improved in 12 out of 22 patients, whereas the remainder had no change in symptoms. Extravasation of calcium phosphate into the joint was the most common complication, whereas no adverse effect has been reported on subsequent arthroplasty.

Conclusion

Limited data from the published studies would suggest that calcium phosphate injection of BML may potentially improve pain and function. However, no evidence is currently available to clearly identify patient/surgical factors that may influence the long-term outcomes of this procedure. Hence pragmatic, prospective studies with stratified patient cohorts and robust reporting of outcome measures are essential to improve the understanding of the indications and clinical effectiveness of this novel procedure.

Introduction

Chronic bone marrow lesions (BML) in the weight-bearing portions of the knee are often associated with symptomatic degenerative arthritis resulting in pain and dysfunction [1,2,3,4]. BML may not be apparent on radiographs and are diagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using fat-saturated T2-weighted, proton density-weighted or short tau inversion recovery (STIR) image sequences [5, 6]. They appear as poorly defined areas of high signal intensity in the subchondral region [5,6,7,8]. These lesions represent sites of increased mechanical stress [9] with subchondral hyperintense signal suggestive of an insufficiency fracture [5, 6]. They may also be correlated with common degenerative conditions of the knee such as meniscal tears [2], cartilage deterioration [5, 6, 9], subchondral bone attrition and cyst formation [3], mechanical malalignment [4] and ultimately, progression of osteoarthritis of the knee [2].

Management of symptomatic BML in patients with degenerate change of the knee using percutaneous injection of bone substitute material like calcium phosphate has been described in the literature [10,11,12]. The proprietary term Subchondroplasty® (SCP) (Zimmer Knee Creations; West Chester, PA, USA) refers to a novel technique in which a BML is injected with a bone substitute material composed of calcium phosphate, using fluoroscopic guidance [13]. The perceived advantages of Subchondroplasty® in managing these patients include the minimally invasive percutaneous technique [14], the potential for improved structural integrity and biomechanical strength of the subchondral bone from the injected calcium phosphate, which may additionally function as a porous osteoconductive scaffold allowing formation of new bone capable of sustaining load [1, 12, 13]. Since the description of the initial procedure in 2008 for chronic BML around the knee, the indications for this technique has been extended by some authors to include osteochondritis dessicans of the lateral tibial plateau in skeletally immature patients [15], subchondral bone marrow oedema of the talar dome due to ankle instability [16], osteochondral lesion of the talus [16] and BML of the shoulder and hip [2]. Initial studies of this procedure as reported in the literature have had encouraging results [1, 11, 13]. However, it is noted that these studies involve small cohorts of patients with limited follow up. Furthermore, some authors have reported unsatisfactory clinical results questioning the efficacy of this procedure in advanced osteoarthritis of the knee [17], femoral BML and lesions with mild bone marrow oedema [18]. It has been reported that there is considerable variation in the biomechanical properties of the commercially available calcium phosphate used as injectable bone substitute material during this procedure [19].

The primary objective of this review was to collate the available clinical studies in the published literature and review the results of percutaneous injection of bone substitute material like calcium phosphate including Subchondroplasty®. The secondary objective was to answer the following questions encountered in the clinical decision-making process of managing patients with BML associated with osteoarthritis of the knee:

  1. 1.

    Does calcium phosphate injection or Subchondroplasty® provide effective long-lasting pain relief to avoid further surgical intervention?

  2. 2.

    Which factors (patient/surgical) significantly influence the outcome following this type of procedure?

  3. 3.

    Does calcium phosphate injection or Subchondroplasty® adversely affect the outcomes of subsequent arthroplasty?

Materials and methods

Literature search and databases

A literature search of all the available evidence was undertaken (June 2019) using the healthcare database website (https://hdas.nice.org.uk). The databases searched were Medline, CINAHL, Embase and the Cochrane library.

Search criteria included boolean statements and the wildcard symbol (femur* OR femoral* OR tibia* OR tibial* OR knee*) AND (bone* OR marrow*) AND (lesion* OR edema* OR oedema*) AND (subchondroplasty*)”. The Cochrane database was reviewed for relevant articles.

An adjunctive bibliography search was undertaken to identify additional relevant articles. Subsequently duplicate articles were excluded and the clinical results of calcium phosphate injection including Subchondroplasty® were reviewed. Animal model and in vitro studies were excluded.

Results

The aforementioned database search and adjunctive bibliography search returned 53 relevant articles of which 7 articles were noted to be duplicates (Fig. 1). Thus, a total of 46 relevant articles were identified in the current literature: amongst these, 8 articles described the clinical results of calcium phosphate injection/subchondroplasty and were selected for further review. Details of the eight articles that describe the clinical outcomes of subchondroplasty are provided in Tables 1 and 2. The salient points are discussed below.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Results of literature search

Full size image
Table 1 Details of clinical studies
Full size table
Table 2 Reported clinical outcomes of calcium phosphate injection including Subchondroplasty®
Full size table

Patient demographics and physiology

Wide variation was noted in the patient population with the youngest patient reported to be 35 years of age at the time of the procedure [11, 13] whereas the oldest patient was 82 years [22].

Body mass index (BMI) is also reported inconsistently in the literature. Some studies [1, 7, 11, 13, 17] provide the details of BMI for their patient cohort whereas other studies [12, 18, 21, 22] do not provide any information on this vital parameter.

Indications and severity of osteoarthritis

There is good agreement in the literature for treating chronic painful bone marrow lesions noted in knee arthritis with injection of calcium phosphate [1, 7, 10, 12, 13, 22]. However, there is a lack of consensus on the degree of radiographic severity of knee arthritis for which this procedure is effective. Whilst some authors [11] have included patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade 4 arthritis, other authors consider it a contraindication [12, 17].

Mechanical parameters (range of motion/lower limb alignment)

Inconsistency is noted in the reported literature on mechanical parameters such as range of motion and mechanical axis in patients undergoing subchondroplasty. Several studies evaluated mechanical axis preoperatively and excluded patients with > 8° of varus/valgus mal-alignment [1, 11, 12, 17]; however, some authors have not stated the mechanical parameters in their series [1, 13, 18].

Surgical technique and postoperative regimen

There is considerable variation in the reported surgical technique used to perform the injection of bone substitute material like calcium phosphate to treat BML associated with knee arthritis. These includes (1) use of different types of commercially available injectable calcium phosphate such as Graftys HBS® (Graftys, Aix en Provence, France) [12], AccuFill® (Zimmer Knee Creations; West Chester, PA, USA) [7, 11, 13, 17]; (2) injection of calcium phosphate into BML under fluoroscopic guidance alone [7, 12] or combining it with arthroscopic assessment of chondral surfaces; (3) adjunctive arthroscopic procedures [1, 10, 11, 13, 17] and viscosupplementation [17, 22] and (4) injection of calcium phosphate with [10, 17] and without [12, 13] the use of a targeting jig/device.

Additionally, variable perioperative and postoperative regimens have been described for this procedure. These include (1) weight-bearing regimens ranging from full weight-bearing [12], weight-bearing as tolerated with crutches for 1 week [11] or for 2 weeks postoperatively [10, 13] to partial weight-bearing for 2 weeks postoperatively [17] and (2) type of analgesia used is variable ranging from none [17], oral/parenteral dipyrone with tramadol [12], acetaminophen with anti-inflammatory medications viz. indomethacin/ibuprofen [17], opiates such as. oxycodone/hydrocodone [17] and oral opiates alone [10, 13] to not reported [1, 11].

Outcome measures and follow-up duration

Different outcome measures have been used to describe the results of this procedure (Tables 1, 2 and 3). These include visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain [1, 11, 12, 22], Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) [12, 17], Lysholm and Tegner score [17], International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score [11, 13] and the Short Form Survey (SF-12) score [13]. The duration of follow up ranged from 6 months [12] to a maximum of 43 months [21].

Table 3 Reported clinical outcomes of calcium phosphate injection including Subchondroplasty®
Full size table

Complications

Extravasation of calcium phosphate into soft tissues or the joint has been reported [10, 12, 13]. Other reported complications include significant postoperative pain [10, 13, 20], which may last up to 12 months [20], persistent drainage at the injection site [11] and deep vein thrombosis [11].

Discussion

Bone marrow lesions

Bone marrow lesions associated with osteoarthritis of the knee have been well-described in the current literature [1,2,3, 6, 8, 9, 23]. It has been suggested that altered biomechanics due to abnormal joint loading and the corresponding subchondral BML contribute to the aetiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis [3, 23]. Chronic BML around the weight-bearing regions of the knee are often associated with symptomatic degenerative arthritis resulting in pain [1,2,3,4]. Management of these lesions has been broadly described using non-operative and operative methods alongside osteoarthritis of the knee. Non-operative methods including oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications have been demonstrated to provide symptomatic relief in patients with osteoarthritis and BML [24]. Use of other medications like bisphosphonates [25] and prostacyclins [26, 27] have been described in the management of BML; however, the long-term efficacy of these measures is limited [2]. Operative methods such as core decompression [28, 29] and high tibial osteotomy [30, 31] have been proposed as treatment options for BML associated with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Surgical technique - paucity of literature

Despite only limited studies being available in the decade since this procedure was first described, the indications have been widely extended to include osteochondritis dessicans of the lateral tibial plateau in skeletally immature patients [15], subchondral bone marrow oedema of the talar dome due to ankle instability [16], osteochondral lesion of the talus [16] and BML of the shoulder and hip [2].

Currently there is a lack of consensus in the literature on the surgical technique for this procedure. Some authors [1, 10, 11, 13, 17] performed adjunctive arthroscopic procedures to address meniscal and chondral lesions in addition to the injection of calcium phosphate. The influence of these adjunctive procedures on the functional improvement in clinical outcomes is difficult to quantify given the small patient cohorts and limited follow up. Careful interpretation of the results from these studies is essential. Intraoperative localisation of BML has been aided using fluoroscopy and targeting devices [17]; however, the use of targeting devices is not consistently reported in the literature [12].

Bone substitute material - nanocrystalline calcium phosphate

As highlighted above, different types of calcium phosphate have been described for injection of painful BML. It has been demonstrated that different types of commercially available calcium phosphate used as bone substitute material have considerable variation in their in vitro injectability and biomechanical properties [19]. Using synthetic (polyurethane foam sheets) and cadaveric cancellous bone blocks, Colon et al. [19] noted that only AccuFill® (Zimmer, Inc.) and StrucSure™ CP (Smith and Nephew) were able to flow into a closed structure such as cancellous bone. Furthermore, they observed that amongst the eight bone substitute materials tested, AccuFill® had the lowest injection force and achieved desired fill of the void. It is interesting to note that both AccuFill® and StrucSure™ CP are composed of nanocrystalline calcium phosphate [19]. Hence the type of calcium phosphate used to inject BML and the pressure used may have a critical influence on the outcome of Subchondroplasty®. The surgical experience of the surgeon performing Subchondroplasty® may be an additional factor.

Imaging features after subchondroplasty

Subsequent to injection of BML with calcium phosphate imaging modalities like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been used to evaluate the subchondral bone. The injected calcium phosphate has been described to demonstrate a low signal surrounded by hyperintense rim on T2-weighted images [5, 7].

Lack of consensus on outcome measures

There is considerable variation in the literature on the outcome measures used to describe the clinical results of calcium phosphate injection into BML (Tables 2 and 3). Analysis of the different outcome measures is presented in Table 3. The VAS score for pain has been demonstrated to significantly decrease following Subchondroplasty® [1, 11, 12, 22]. Some authors have reported an improvement in the KOOS [12, 17] and IKDC score [11, 13], whereas the Tegner Lysholm score [17] was noted to deteriorate in a different study. This lack of consensus is a major limitation in the interpretation of results. Hence it is essential to establish a set of robust clinical and radiological outcome measures that will be consistently used in future studies to report the results of this procedure.

Limited follow up and natural history of osteoarthritis

The maximum reported follow up after this procedure is 43 months [21]. Given the long-standing natural history of osteoarthritis, the limited follow up reported in the current literature is a further limitation in the interpretation of results.

Morbidity and implications for future procedures after subchondroplasty

Overall, the injection of calcium phosphate into BML around the knee appears to be associated with limited morbidity. Extravasation of the material into the soft tissues or into the joint have been reported [10, 12, 13]. However, calcium phosphate is a hydrophilic material and it has been suggested that the residual material can be removed arthroscopically using standard instruments [13].

The perceived advantage of injectable calcium phosphate is that it may be able to function as a scaffold following the setting process involving an endothermic reaction [13, 14]. This enables bone growth providing structural support [11]. Nonetheless there has been concern that this alteration in bony architecture may limit future procedures like arthroplasty. This has been addressed in a recent study by Yoo et al. [32]. They reported no increase in surgical complexity among patients undergoing arthroplasty following Subchondroplasty®. Furthermore, they noted that these patients had a similar postoperative Oxford score to their control group.

Lack of comparative studies for novel techniques

From a basic science perspective, calcium phosphate injection of BML has been suggested to play a mechanical role providing structural support [1, 11, 13]. BML are sites of altered bone remodelling activity in which the mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) play a crucial role [33]. It has been demonstrated that as the frequency of symptomatic BML increases with progression of knee osteoarthritis, necessitating arthroplasty [34]. Hence novel techniques using biological agents such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or dual-action antiresorptive agents such as strontium ranelate delivered directly into BML has been proposed to improve bone homeostasis and joint preservation [34]. However, there is no study in the current literature comparing these novel techniques with calcium phosphate injection of BML.

Conclusions

The limited data from the current studies would suggest that injection of calcium phosphate in BML including Subchondroplasty® may improve pain and function. The procedure is associated with limited morbidity and it does not appear to negatively influence the outcome of subsequent arthroplasty. However, the type of injectable calcium phosphate and adjunctive procedures undertaken may have an influence on the clinical outcome. Hence pragmatic, prospective studies with stratified patient cohorts, longer follow-up duration and robust outcome measures are essential to improve the current understanding of the indications and the clinical effectiveness of this procedure.

Availability of data and materials

Presented in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

BML:

Bone marrow lesion

IKDC:

International Knee Documentation Committee

KOOS:

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells

NR:

Not reported

PRP:

Platelet-rich plasma

SCP:

Subchondroplasty

SD:

Standard deviation

SF-12:

Short Form Survey Score

STIR:

Short tau inversion recovery

T-L:

Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale

VAS:

Visual analog scale

References

  1. Sharkey PF, Cohen SB, Leinberry CF, Parvizi J (2012) Subchondral bone marrow lesions associated with knee osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop 41(9):413–417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins JA, Beutel BG, Strauss E, Youm T, Jazrawi L (2016) Bone marrow edema: chronic bone marrow lesions of the knee and the association with osteoarthritis. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 74(1):24–36

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roemer FW, Neogi T, Nevitt MC, Felson DT, Zhu Y, Zhang Y et al (2010) Subchondral bone marrow lesions are highly associated with, and predict subchondral bone attrition longitudinally: the MOST study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18(1):47 Osteoarthritis Research Society

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Felson DT, Chaisson CE, Hill CL et al (2001) The association of bone marrow lesions with pain in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med 134(7):541–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Agten CA, Kaplan DJ, Jazrawi LM, Burke CJ (2016) Subchondroplasty: what the radiologist needs to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207(6):1257–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roemer FW, Frobell R, Hunter DJ, Crema MD, Fischer W, Bohndorf K et al (2009) MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow signal alterations of the knee joint: terminology, imaging appearance, relevance and radiological differential diagnosis. Osteoarthr Cartil 17(9):1115–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nevalainen MT, Sharkey PF, Cohen SB, Roedl JB, Zoga AC, Morrison WB (2016) MRI findings of subchondroplasty of the knee: a two-case report. Clin Imaging 40(2):241–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonadio MB, Filho AGO, Helito CP, Stump XM, Demange MK (2017) Bone marrow lesion: image, clinical presentation, and treatment. Magn Reson Insights 10:1178623x17703382

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Segal NA, Kern A, Anderson DD, Niu J, Lynch J, Guermazi A et al (2012) Elevated tibiofemoral articular contact stress predicts risk for bone marrow lesions and cartilage damage at 30 months. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20(10):1120–1126 Osteoarthritis Research Society

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen SB, Sharkey PF (2012) Surgical treatment of osteoarthritis pain related to subchondral bone defects or bone marrow lesions: subchondroplasty. Tech Knee Surg 11(4):170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen SB, Sharkey PF (2016) Subchondroplasty for treating bone marrow lesions. J Knee Surg 29(7):555–563

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonadio MB, Giglio PN, Helito CP, Pecora JR, Camanho GL, Demange MK (2017) Subchondroplasty for treating bone marrow lesions in the knee - initial experience. Rev Bras Ortop 52(3):325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farr J, Cohen SB (2013) Expanding applications of the subchondroplasty procedure for the treatment of bone marrow lesions observed on magnetic resonance imaging. Oper Tech Sports Med 21(2):138–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Creations ZK. Subchondroplasty® procedure. 2017. Available from: http://subchondroplasty.com/healthcare-professionals-overview.html. 25 Oct 2107

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abrams GD, Alentorn-Geli E, Harris JD, Cole BJ (2013) Treatment of a lateral tibial plateau osteochondritis dissecans lesion with subchondral injection of calcium phosphate. Arthrosc Tech 2(3):e271–e274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller JR, Dunn KW (2015) Subchondroplasty of the ankle: a novel technique. Foot Ankle Online J 8(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chatterjee D, McGee A, Strauss E, Youm T, Jazrawi L (2015) Subchondral calcium phosphate is ineffective for bone marrow edema lesions in adults with advanced osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(7):2334–2342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor C, Casagranda, B; Long, J; Akhavan, S editor Abstracts 2017 society of skeletal radiology annual scientific meeting. Skeletal radiology; 2017

    Google Scholar 

  19. Colon DA, Yoon BV, Russell TA, Cammisa FP, Abjornson C (2015) Assessment of the injection behavior of commercially available bone BSMs for Subchondroplasty(R) procedures. Knee 22(6):597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Conaway WK, Agrawal R, Nazal MR, Stelzer JW, Martin SD (2019) Changing MRI after subchondroplasty with partial meniscectomy for knee osteoarthritis. Clin Imaging 56:13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Byrd JM, Akhavan S, Frank DA (2017) Mid-term outcomes of the subchondroplasty procedure for patients with osteoarthritis and bone marrow edema. Orthop J Sports Med 5(7 suppl6):2325967117S00291

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis AT, Byrd JM, Zenner JA, Frank DA, DeMeo PJ, Akhavan S (2015) Short-term outcomes of the subchondroplasty procedure for the treatment of bone marrow edema lesions in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Orthop J Sports Med 3(7 suppl2):2325967115S00125

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lo GH, Hunter DJ, Zhang Y, McLennan CE, LaValley MP, Kiel DP et al (2005) Bone marrow lesions in the knee are associated with increased local bone density. Arthritis Rheum 52(9):2814–2821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Korompilias AV, Karantanas AH, Lykissas MG, Beris AE (2008) Transient osteoporosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16(8):480–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartl C, Imhoff A, Bartl R (2012) Treatment of bone marrow edema syndrome with intravenous ibandronate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(12):1781–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mayerhoefer M, Kramer J, Breitenseher M, Norden C, Vakil-Adli A, Hofmann S et al (2007) Short-term outcome of painful bone marrow oedema of the knee following oral treatment with iloprost or tramadol: results of an exploratory phase II study of 41 patients. Rheumatology 46(9):1460–1465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Meizer R, Radda C, Stolz G, Kotsaris S, Petje G, Krasny C et al (2005) MRI-controlled analysis of 104 patients with painful bone marrow edema in different joint localizations treated with the prostacyclin analogue iloprost. Wien Klin Wochenschr 117(7):278–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Duany NG, Zywiel MG, McGrath MS, Siddiqui JA, Jones LC, Bonutti PM et al (2010) Joint-preserving surgical treatment of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jacobs MA, Loeb PE, Hungerford DS (1989) Core decompression of the distal femur for avascular necrosis of the knee. Bone Joint J 71(4):583–587

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kröner A, Berger C, Kluger R, Oberhauser G, Bock P, Engel A (2007) Influence of high tibial osteotomy on bone marrow edema in the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kesemenlı CC, Memısoglu K, Muezzınoglu US, Akansel G (2013) Treatment for painful bone marrow edema by open wedge tibial osteotomy. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23(7):825–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoo JY, O'Malley MJ, Matsen Ko LJ, Cohen SB, Sharkey PF (2016) Knee arthroplasty after subchondroplasty: early results, complications, and technical challenges. J Arthroplast 31(10):2188–2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sánchez M, Anitua E, Delgado D, Sanchez P, Prado R, Goiriena JJ et al (2016) A new strategy to tackle severe knee osteoarthritis: combination of intra-articular and intraosseous injections of platelet rich plasma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 16(5):627–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tanamas SK, Wluka AE, Pelletier J-P, Pelletier JM, Abram F, Berry PA et al (2010) Bone marrow lesions in people with knee osteoarthritis predict progression of disease and joint replacement: a longitudinal study. Rheumatology 49(12):2413–2419

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL53 7AN, UK

    D. S. Angadi

  2. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK

    D. Edwards & J. T. K. Melton

Authors
  1. D. S. Angadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Edwards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. T. K. Melton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors contributed towards the literature search, critical review, data analysis and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. S. Angadi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angadi, D.S., Edwards, D. & Melton, J.T.K. Calcium phosphate injection of symptomatic bone marrow lesions of the knee: what is the current clinical evidence?. Knee Surg & Relat Res 32, 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0013-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0013-3

Keywords

Knee Surgery & Related Research

ISSN: 2234-2451