Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification of plasma and urinary inflammatory markers in severe knee osteoarthritis: Relations with synovial fluid markers

Knee Surgery & Related Research volume 36, Article number: 19 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to identify plasma and urinary cytokines as potential biomarkers for severe knee osteoarthritis (OA). It also investigated associations between these cytokines and cartilage markers, as well as their connections with synovial fluid (SF) markers.

Methods

Samples of plasma, urine, and SF were obtained from patients (n = 40) undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) due to severe knee OA. Control samples of plasma and urine were collected from non-OA individuals (n = 15). We used a Luminex immunoassay for the simultaneous measurement of 19 cytokines, MMP-1, and MMP-3 levels. COMP, CTX-II, and hyaluronan (HA) levels were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to analyze each biomarker’s performance. Correlations among these biomarkers were evaluated via Spearman’s correlation.

Results

The levels of plasma (p)CCL11, pCXCL16, pIL-8, pIL-15, pHA, urinary (u)CCL2, uCCL11, uCCL19, uCXCL16, uIL-1β, uIL-6, uIL-8, uIL-12p70, uIL-15, uIL-33, uMMP-3, uHA, uCTX-II, and uCOMP were significantly elevated in individuals with severe knee OA. Notably, specific correlations were observed between the plasma/urine biomarkers and SF biomarkers: pCCL11 with sfHA (r = 0.56) and sfTNF-α (r = 0.58), pIL-15 with sfCCL19 (r = 0.43) and sfCCL20 (r = 0.44), and uCCL19 with sfCCL11 (r = 0.45) and sfIL-33 (r = 0.51). Positive correlations were also observed between uCCL11 and its corresponding sfCCL11(r = 0.49), as well as between sfCCL11 and other cytokines, namely sfCCL4, sfCCL19, sfCCL20, sfIL-33, and sfTNF-α (r = 0.46–0.63).

Conclusion

This study provides an extensive profile of systemic inflammatory mediators in plasma of knee OA and identified four inflammatory markers (pCCL11, pIL-15, uCCL11, and uCCL19) reflecting joint inflammation.

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by a high prevalence but lacks disease-modifying treatments before joint replacement surgery is resorted to. It is a growing global concern, attributed to aging populations, increasing obesity rates, and even sports-related injuries among young individuals [1]. OA requires long-term management after onset, so additional research is needed to identify and verify biomarkers [2]. Biomarkers are valuable for diagnosis, phenotype identification, disease progression prediction, treatment response monitoring, and predicting drug responsiveness in OA patients. Furthermore, these findings may help in understanding the pathogenesis of OA and developing new drug targets [3].

Currently, OA is understood to be a disorder affecting movable joints characterized by micro- and macro-damage that triggers maladaptive repair responses, including pro-inflammatory pathways. It is no longer regarded simply as a “wear and tear” disease confined to the older population [4]. Inflammation within the synovium is a consistent feature across all OA stages and is closely associated with symptomatic manifestations such as joint pain, swelling, and stiffness [5,6,7]. Various inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukins (ILs), and chemokines, play pivotal roles in mediating leukocyte infiltration and exacerbating irreversible cartilage degeneration [8,9,10]. Although inflammatory biomarkers for OA are expected to offer a promising avenue for revealing its pathogenesis and developing therapeutics [11], only a limited number of these biomarkers have been clinically applied.

Joint synovial fluid (SF) contains substances related to OA pathophysiology, including inflammatory mediators, cartilage-degrading enzymes, and cartilage-derived products; thus, it occupies an important position in biomarker research for OA. However, limitations in developing and clinically applying SF-based biomarkers exist due to the invasiveness of sample collection, variations in the presence of SF, and the skilled techniques required for collection [12]. Recently, blood or urine, which can be collected by a less invasive route, have been applied in biomarker research as a surrogate matrix for SF.

The aim of this study was to identify plasma and urine cytokines as potential biomarkers for severe knee OA and to analyze the correlation of these biomarkers with SF markers and cartilage turnover markers to contribute to the development of less invasive biomarkers for joint inflammation and degradation assessment. We selected 19 cytokines on the basis of previous reports related to the pathophysiology of knee OA [13,14,15]. Our study involved simultaneous assessment and comparison of 19 cytokines and five cartilage markers across SF, plasma, and urine samples from severe knee OA patients and controls. Given this focus, it was necessary to exclude participants who had conditions that could independently alter cytokine levels, as this would have confounded the relationship that we were trying to investigate between OA and cytokine levels. Conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, chronic renal diseases, chronic liver diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), malignant tumors, diabetes mellitus, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are closely associated with inflammation. This association can affect their onset, progression, and the emergence of complications, leading to variations in systemic inflammatory markers and influencing cytokine levels [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Therefore, these conditions were excluded from this study, ensuring that the observed changes in cytokines had a direct relationship with OA disease.

Methods

Study design and population

This prospective case‒control study received approval from the institutional review board (IRB; No. HDT 2020-06-026), and all participants provided written informed consent. Between August 2020 and July 2021, patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for end-stage OA were recruited from our institution. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) a diagnosis of primary knee OA based on the clinical and radiological criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (pain in the knee and at least three of the following: age > 50 years, stiffness < 30 min, crepitus and osteophytes) [23] and (2) a disease severity grade 3–4 according to the Kellgren–Lawrence (K-L) classification. Exclusion criteria included: (1) traumatic arthritis, (2) rheumatoid arthritis, (3) chronic renal diseases, (4) chronic liver diseases, (5) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), (6) malignant tumor, (7) diabetes mellitus, (8) inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and (9) previous knee surgery on the same side. Age-matched individuals receiving regular medical examinations at the same hospital were recruited as healthy controls based on exclusion criteria. None of the control subjects had evidence of OA assessed clinically. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and control subjects prior to inclusion in this study. Initially, informed consent was obtained from 60 participants (45 with severe knee OA and 15 healthy controls). Five patients with insufficient SF were excluded from the study, resulting in the inclusion of 55 participants (40 with severe knee OA and 15 healthy controls). The demographic data of the study population are presented in Table 1. This study exclusively analyzed and compared SF, plasma, and urinary inflammatory mediator levels in both the control group and knee OA patients, focusing solely on knee OA and not considering other variables.

Table 1 Demographic data of the study population
Full size table

Biological sample collection and preparation

SFs (n = 40) were collected via needle aspiration from the patient’s knee joint during TKA or UKA surgery. A 16-gauge needle was connected to a 10 cc syringe for collection of SF. A standard anteromedial arthroscopy portal approach was taken to aspirate the contents of the joint. To ensure methodological consistency and minimize variability, the collection of SF from patients was conducted exclusively by a single surgeon. SF samples were centrifuged at 4000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to separate solid debris and cells. The SF supernatant was aliquoted into microfuge tubes and stored at −80 °C until analysis. SF supernatant was subjected to analysis after reaction with hyaluronidase [24]. After overnight fasting, venous blood samples were collected from all participants into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-containing vacutainer tubes. Urine samples were collected by self-voiding in sterile urine collection cups with a screw-on lid. All participants were instructed to provide a midstream urine sample. Blood and urine samples were kept at 4 °C within 1 h of collection until processing. After separation by centrifugation (4000 × g for 10 min), plasma and urine supernatant were divided into aliquots into microfuge tubes and stored at −80 °C until analysis. The subsequent steps (collection, transportation, centrifugation, aliquot, and storage) of SF, plasma, and urine samples were uniformly handled by a single research staff member. This approach across all sample types was meticulously maintained to safeguard against any potential impact on sample quality or the study’s outcomes.

Luminex bead-based assay

SF, plasma, and urine analytes were quantified using a Human Magnetic Luminex® Assay (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [samples (1:2 dilution) or standards (7-point dilution)]. The 21-plex assay allowed us to evaluate the following analytes: C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL) 2/MCP-1, CCL3/MIP-1α, CCL4/MIP-1β, CCL11/Eotaxin, CCL19/MIP-3β, CCL20/MIP-3α, C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand (CX3CL) 1/Fractalkine, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL) 1/GROα, CXCL5/ENA-78, CXCL10/IP-10, CXCL16, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12p70, IL-15, IL-33, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-3, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. The specific fluorescence was analyzed with a MAGPIX® system (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX, USA). The xPONENT 4.2 software package (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX, USA) was used for calibration, performance verification, and calculation of analyte concentration by using five-parameter logistic regression (5-PL).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type II collagen (CTX-II), hyaluronan (HA), and creatinine levels were determined using commercially available ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (COMP, HA, and creatinine with R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA, and CTX-II with Cusabio, Houston, TX, USA). Samples were diluted using reagent diluent to bring analyte levels into the calibration range of the assay as follows: COMP (1:40,000 dilution for SF, 1:800 dilution for plasma, and no dilution for urine), CTX-II (1:2 dilution for SF and urine and no dilution for plasma), and HA (1:100 dilution for SF, 1:5 dilution for plasma, and 1:2 for urine). The absorbance was analyzed using an Epoch microplate ELISA reader (Bio Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). All urinary marker levels were normalized to the urinary creatinine concentration.

Statistical analysis

Analytes with more than 50% of the samples showing out-of-range low values were excluded. Supplementary Table S1 provides details regarding the assay sensitivity and detection rates for these analytes. For the statistical analyses, GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, Inc., Boston, MA, USA) and SPSS Statistics 27 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) were used. The results are displayed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or mean with 95% confidence interval (CI). The normality of the distribution was analyzed with the D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test. Differences in analytes between patients and healthy controls were determined using the Mann‒Whitney U test (nonnormal distribution). A P-value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The biomarker results were subjected to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Optimal cutoff values were determined using Youden’s J statistic to determine the cutoff for knee OA in the control group. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate correlations between parameters. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The sample size was determined using a priori power analysis with G*Power 3.1.9.4 software, focusing on the capacity of uCTX-II levels to differentiate knee OA patients from healthy controls [25, 26]. This analysis was based on the differences in uCTX-II levels reported by Jung et al. [27], where controls exhibited levels of 190 ± 109 ng/mmol and knee OA patients 429 ± 257 ng/mmol, resulting in an effect size (d) of 1.21. We set the allocation ratio of patients to controls at 3, with a power of 95% and an alpha at 0.05, and using a two-tailed test, which indicated a required sample size of 13 controls and 37 patients. Anticipating potential dropouts, we considered a dropout rate of approximately 10% for controls due to general attrition and 20% for patients, specifically influenced by the availability of sufficient SF. Thus, 15 (controls) and 45 (patient) subjects were assumed to be sufficient for the statistical analyses in this study. Ultimately, 5 patients were excluded due to insufficient SF, allowing the study to proceed with 15 controls and 40 patients.

Results

Increased cytokine levels in plasma, urine, and SF samples from patients with severe knee OA

This study enrolled 40 patients (40 knees) and 15 controls. Matched SF, plasma, and urine samples were collected from patients (n = 40; SF, plasma, and urine) and controls (n = 15; plasma and urine). The levels of 19 inflammatory cytokines in the plasma, urine, and SF were measured for severe knee OA patients and controls (Table 2). Significantly greater levels of pCXCL16 (P = 0.005) and pIL-15 (P = 0.038) were detected in severe knee OA patients. Table 3 listed the AUC values and the corresponding cutoff value, sensitivity, and specificity. The ROC curves generated for pCXCL16 and pIL-15 had AUC values of 0.81 and 0.76, respectively (Fig. 1).

Table 2 The levels of cytokines in OA patients and control groups
Full size table
Table 3 ROC analysis of plasma and urinary cytokines (controls versus knee OA)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

ROC curves for plasma and urine biomarkers in severe knee OA patients and controls. A pCXCL16 and pIL-15; B uCCL2, uCCL11 and uCCL19; and C uCXCL16, uIL-8, and uIL-12p70

Full size image

Urinary levels of six proteins were notably greater in severe knee OA patients than in controls: uCCL2 (P < 0.0001), uCCL11 (P < 0.0001), uCCL19 (P = 0.002), uCXCL16 (P < 0.0001), uIL-8 (P = 0.003), and uIL-12 (P = 0.001). ROC analysis revealed AUC values of 0.97 for uCCL2, 0.99 for CCL11, 0.88 for CCL19, 0.97 for CXCL16, 0.83 for IL-8, and 0.90 for IL-12p70 (Fig. 1; Table 3). Our analysis revealed that, among plasma and urine markers, uCCL11 had the highest AUC for knee OA diagnosis, followed by uCXCL16.

Additionally, pCCL11, pIL-8, uCCL20, uIL-33, and uIL-1β were detectable in severe knee OA patients but undetectable in controls (Table 2). Elevated levels of CCL11, IL-8, IL-15, and CXCL16 were consistent in both plasma and urine samples from OA patients.

Evaluation of cartilage markers in plasma, urine, and SF samples from severe knee OA patients

Given the profound impact of inflammation on cartilage turnover, we investigated the potential link between inflammation and cartilage markers. We also evaluated the concentrations of five cartilage markers (COMP, CTX-II, HA, MMP-1, and MMP-3) in severe knee OA patients and controls (Table 4). The levels of cartilage markers in the OA SF samples were greater than those in the OA plasma or urine samples. The concentrations of pHA (P = 0.004), uCOMP (P < 0.0001), uCTX-II (P = 0.001), uHA (P < 0.0001), and uMMP-3 (P < 0.0001) were greater in severe knee OA patients than in controls. ROC analysis demonstrated AUC values of 0.81 for pHA, 0.95 for uCOMP, 0.89 for uCTX-II, 1.00 for uHA, and 0.97 for uMMP-3 (Fig. 2; Table 4).

Table 4 The levels of cartilage markers in the synovial fluid, plasma, and urine of OA patients or control groups
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC curves for plasma and urine cartilage markers in severe knee OA patients and controls. A pHA, B uCOMP and uCTX-II, and C uHA and uMMP-3

Full size image

Correlations between biomarkers in plasma samples and SF concentrations

We sought to identify plasma/urine biomarkers reflecting the osteoarthritic milieu by investigating correlations between these biomarkers and SF biomarkers. Spearman correlation analysis was performed on the plasma biomarkers (pCCL11, pCXCL16, pIL-8, pIL-15, and pHA) and urine biomarkers (uCCL2, uCCL11, uCCL19, uCCL20, uCXCL16, uIL-1β, uIL-6, uIL-8, uIL-12p70, uIL-15, uMMP-3, uHA, uCTX-II, and uCOMP) versus the overall biomarker profile of the SF samples. As shown in Table 5, pCCL11 exhibited a positive correlation with sfTNF-α (r = 0.58, P = 0.021) and sfHA (r = 0.56, P = 0.002). Conversely, pHA was negatively correlated with sfCCL11 (r = −0.47, P = 0.012). pIL-15 was positively correlated with sfCCL19 (r = 0.43, P = 0.024) and sfCCL20 (r = 0.44, P = 0.019).

Table 5 Correlation coefficient between markers
Full size table

Correlations between biomarkers in urine samples and SF concentrations

As shown in Table 5, positive correlations between urine biomarkers and SF biomarkers were observed. uCCL19 was correlated with sfCCL11 (r = 0.45, P = 0.032) and sfIL-33 (r = 0.51, P = 0.012). Notably, among the systemic biomarkers, uCCL11 was the sole marker exhibiting a positive correlation with its corresponding sfCCL11 (r = 0.49, P = 0.014; Table 5) and with higher CCL11 concentrations in SF than in urine (Table 2). Intriguingly, sfCCL11 also exhibited positive correlations with five other SF cytokines: sfCCL4 (r = 0.48, P = 0.009), sfCCL19 (r = 0.52, P = 0.004), sfCCL20 (r = 0.46, P = 0.011), sfIL-33 (r = 0.51, P = 0.005), and sfTNF-α (r = 0.63, P = 0.010; Table 5).

Moreover, uHA exhibited a negative correlation with eight SF biomarkers (sfCCL4, sfCCL19, sfCCL20, sfCXCL1, sfIL-15, sfIL-33, sfMMP-1, and sfMMP-3), among which sfIL-15 (r = −0.71, P = 0.0001) exhibited the strongest negative correlation. uCTX-II was negatively correlated with four SF biomarkers (sfCCL19, sfCXCL1, sfCXCL10, and sfMMP-3), and sfCXCL1 (r = −0.53, P = 0.006) exhibited the most pronounced negative correlation. Furthermore, sfMMP-3 exhibited a negative correlation with both uHA (r = −0.47, P = 0.019) and uCTX-II (r = −0.48, P = 0.016; Table 5).

Discussion

Biomarkers have the potential to revolutionize the quality of life of OA patients, improve individualized care, and help identify new therapeutic targets and mechanisms for more efficient drug trials [28]. This study aimed to identify inflammatory biomarkers, along with cartilage markers, in plasma and urine from knee OA patients. Furthermore, we examined the associations between systemic inflammatory markers (plasma and urine) and local joint inflammation (synovial fluid). Our main findings indicated elevated levels of several cytokines in plasma (pCCL11, pCXCL16, pIL-8, and pIL-15) and urine (uCCL2, uCCL11, uCCL19, uCCL20, uCXCL16, uIL-1β, uIL-6, uIL-8, uIL-12p70, and uIL-15) from severe knee OA patients. These cytokines emerged as effective identifiers of osteoarthritic patients, performing comparably to cartilage markers based on ROC analysis. And our results unveiled the correlations between systemic cytokines and cytokines/cartilage biomarker in SF among knee OA patients.

Among the cytokines tested, CCL11, IL-8, IL-15, and CXCL16 were consistently increased in both the plasma and urine. While direct comparisons of urine results are challenging due to limited reports on uCCL11, uIL-8, uIL-15, and uCXCL16, previous studies have reported elevated pCCL11 levels in knee OA patients compared with controls [29, 30]. Our data revealed bidirectional correlations between CCL11 and HA in plasma. pCCL11 exhibited a positive correlation with sfHA, whereas pHA displayed a negative correlation with sfCCL11. Notably, uCCL11 was the only cytokine showing a correlation with corresponding SF concentration, indicating its potential origin from the joint and its reflection of SF levels. sfCCL11 levels were positively related to K-L grade and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) index, and knee OA patients with elevated sfCCL11 levels exhibited severe radiographic changes [30]. It was reported that CCL11 plays a crucial role in knee OA by being produced in cytokine-stimulated chondrocytes. Activation with CCL11 increased enzymes MMP-3 and MMP-13, linked to inflammation and cartilage damage. Furthermore, blocking CCL11 with an antibody significantly reduced MMP-3 expression triggered by IL-1β, pointing to a possible treatment approach for OA [30, 31]. Although our study did not confirm direct correlations between CCL11 and MMPs in urine or SF (Supplementary Table S2, S3), our findings revealed a positive correlation between sfCCL11 and several other SF cytokines (CCL4, CCL19, CCL20, IL-33, and TNF-α). Therefore, uCCL11 may be considered the most significant urinary cytokine and a biomarker reflecting intra-articular inflammation.

Previous reports have highlighted the correlation between sfIL-8 concentration and clinical severity [32], whereas serum IL-8 levels are reported to have no association with clinical severity [33]. It was reported that pIL-8 is positively correlated with pMMP-1 and pIL-15 in OA patients [34]. However, our study could not confirm these correlations. In our investigation, uIL-8 was positively correlated with uCX3CL1, uCXCL10, uCXCL16, uIL-6, and uMMP-3 (Supplementary Table S2). However, we found no SF markers that correlated with pIL-8 or uIL-8. IL-15 has been proposed as a potential biomarker for the early diagnosis of OA, with elevated levels observed in both SF and serum in early-stage disease compared with advanced disease [35, 36]. A correlation between sfIL-15 levels and sfMMP-1 and sfMMP-3 has been indicated [36]. Our study also revealed a positive correlation between sfIL-15 and sfMMP-1 (Supplementary Table S3). However, this correlation was not evident in the plasma samples.

In the field of biomarker research, cartilage markers have been the subject of comprehensive and in-depth studies. In line with the findings of previous studies [12, 37], our study reaffirmed the elevation of promising OA biomarkers, namely, pHA and uCTX-II, in severe knee OA. Additionally, we observed increased urinary levels of COMP, HA, MMP-1, and MMP-3 in severe knee OA patients compared with controls. There have been few reports on changes in the urinary levels of COMP, HA, MMP-1, and MMP-3 in OA patients. To assess the association of urinary cartilage markers with intra-articular inflammatory factors, we analyzed the correlation between plasma/urinary cartilage markers and SF cytokines. No significant positive correlations were detected between plasma or urinary cartilage marker levels and SF cytokine levels. uHA and uCTX-II levels were inversely related to alterations in important inflammatory and cartilage degradation markers in the SF. The strong negative correlation of uHA with sfIL-15, as well as the shared negative correlation of both uHA and uCTX-II with sfCCL19, sf CXCL11, and sfMMP-3, indicated their potential relevance in reflecting changes in the inflammatory milieu within the joint. These findings suggested that changes in uHA and uCTX-II levels may indicate successful modulation of inflammation and tissue degradation related to OA. Therefore, they have the potential to be useful as pharmacodynamic markers for assessing joint inflammation and monitoring responses to OA treatments. Further validation of these biomarkers in clinical studies is necessary to confirm their utility and establish their role in OA management.

Our findings contribute to the understanding of the inflammatory profiles in severe OA. The biomarkers identified in this study are associated with inflammatory processes that play a critical role in the pathogenesis of OA. These biomarkers could provide a deeper understanding of the biochemical and cellular processes involved in the progression of OA. They could inform the development of therapeutic strategies targeting inflammation in late-stage OA. These insights have the potential to be extended to early-stage OA in future research, offering a promising direction for developing diagnostic and monitoring strategies that are less invasive and broadly applicable across different stages of the disease.

This study has several limitations. First, biological samples were collected only from patients with K-L grade 3 or 4; therefore, we did not compare biomarker patterns between early-stage and end-stage OA. It was not possible to obtain blood and urine samples from patients with early-stage OA in our clinical setting. Second, it is still in the pilot stage with a relatively small number of patients. Third, SF was absent in the control group due to an insufficient amount of joint effusion present in healthy joints for aspiration; however, forcible collection can be considered unethical. Fourth, the phenotype of knee OA was not reflected. Knee OA is a disease with a large degree of heterogeneity, and it is known that clinical symptoms and related factors vary depending on the OA phenotype. Although this study considered inflammation as a major etiological factor of OA, there was a limitation in that the analysis subjects could not be limited to knee OA patients with an inflammatory phenotype. Finally, cytokines and cartilage turnover markers could not be analyzed for their association with radiological signs and clinical symptoms. Therefore, our results are provisional and need to be validated through further research to determine generalizability. Improving the study design and obtaining more data have the potential to enhance its practical value in clinical settings.

Conclusion

We evaluated the correlations between multiple cytokines and cartilage markers in plasma, urine, and SF samples from severe knee OA patients. Fourteen cytokines and 5 cartilage markers were elevated in the plasma or urine of severe knee OA patients, compared with those in the control group. Several systemic biomarkers (pCCL11, pIL-15, uCCL11, uCCL19, uHA, and uCTX-II) were correlated with SF markers, suggesting their potential to reflect local synovial inflammation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CCL:

C-C motif chemokine ligand

CI:

Confidence interval

COMP:

Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein

CTX-II:

C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type II collagen

CXCL:

C-X-C motif chemokine ligand

CX3CL:

C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

HA:

Hyaluronan

IL:

Interleukin

MMP:

Matrix metalloproteinase

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

TKA:

Total knee arthroplasty

UKA:

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

References

  1. Meehan RT, Regan EA, Hoffman ED, Wolf ML, Gill MT, Crooks JL et al. (2021) Synovial fluid cytokines, chemokines and MMP levels in osteoarthritis patients with knee pain display a profile similar to many rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Clin Med 10(21):5027. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mabey T, Honsawek S (2015) Cytokines as biochemical markers for knee osteoarthritis. World J Orthop 6(1):95–105. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.95

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. van Spil WE, Szilagyi IA (2020) Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: biomarkers (biochemical markers). Osteoarthr Cartil 28(3):296–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kraus VB, Blanco FJ, Englund M, Karsdal MA, Lohmander LS (2015) Call for standardized definitions of osteoarthritis and risk stratification for clinical trials and clinical use. Osteoarthr Cartil 23(8):1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Lange-Brokaar BJ, Ioan-Facsinay A, van Osch GJ, Zuurmond AM, Schoones J, Toes RE et al. (2012) Synovial inflammation, immune cells and their cytokines in osteoarthritis: a review. Osteoarthr Cartil 20(12):1484–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Atukorala I, Kwoh CK, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Boudreau RM, Hannon MJ et al. (2016) Synovitis in knee osteoarthritis: a precursor of disease? Ann Rheum Dis 75(2):390–395. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kisand K, Tamm AE, Lintrop M, Tamm AO (2018) New insights into the natural course of knee osteoarthritis: early regulation of cytokines and growth factors, with emphasis on sex-dependent angiogenesis and tissue remodeling. A pilot study. Osteoarthr Cartil 26(8):1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.05.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang CR, Shih KS, Liou JP, Wu YW, Hsieh IN, Lee HY et al. (2014) Denbinobin upregulates miR-146a expression and attenuates IL-1beta-induced upregulation of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expressions in osteoarthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. J Mol Med 92(11):1147–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-014-1192-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benito MJ, Veale DJ, FitzGerald O, van den Berg WB, Bresnihan B (2005) Synovial tissue inflammation in early and late osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 64(9):1263–1267. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.025270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Koskinen A, Vuolteenaho K, Moilanen T, Moilanen E (2014) Resistin as a factor in osteoarthritis: synovial fluid resistin concentrations correlate positively with interleukin 6 and matrix metalloproteinases MMP-1 and MMP-3. Scand J Rheumatol 43(3):249–253. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009742.2013.853096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Braaten JA, Banovetz MT, DePhillipo NN, Familiari F, Russo R, Kennedy NI et al. (2022) Biomarkers for osteoarthritis diseases. Life 12(11):1799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rousseau JC, Chapurlat R, Garnero P (2021) Soluble biological markers in osteoarthritis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X211040300

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Boffa A, Merli G, Andriolo L, Lattermann C, Salzmann GM, Filardo G (2021) Synovial fluid biomarkers in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and quantitative evaluation using BIPEDs criteria. Cartilage 13(1):82S-103S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603520942941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Scanzello CR (2017) Chemokines and inflammation in osteoarthritis: insights from patients and animal models. J Orthop Res 35(4):735–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Clarke J (2021) IL-33 is a potential new target in OA. Nat Rev Rheumatol 17(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-00542-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barbu C, Iordache M, Man MG (2011) Inflammation in COPD: pathogenesis, local and systemic effects. Rom J Morphol Embryol 52(1):21–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW (2010) Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 376(9746):1094–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60826-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aregay A, Dirks M, Schlaphoff V, Owusu Sekyere S, Haag K, Falk CS et al. (2018) Systemic inflammation and immune cell phenotypes are associated with neuro-psychiatric symptoms in patients with chronic inflammatory liver diseases. Liver Int 38(12):2317–2328. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li H, Li M, Liu C, He P, Dong A, Dong S et al. (2023) Causal effects of systemic inflammatory regulators on chronic kidney diseases and renal function: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Front Immunol 14:1229636. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1229636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rohm TV, Meier DT, Olefsky JM, Donath MY (2022) Inflammation in obesity, diabetes, and related disorders. Immunity 55(1):31–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.12.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Muzes G, Molnar B, Tulassay Z, Sipos F (2012) Changes of the cytokine profile in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Gastroenterol 18(41):5848–5861. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i41.5848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiss M, Caro AA, Raes G, Laoui D (2020) Systemic reprogramming of monocytes in cancer. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01399

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K et al. (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 29(8):1039–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780290816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jayadev C, Rout R, Price A, Hulley P, Mahoney D (2012) Hyaluronidase treatment of synovial fluid to improve assay precision for biomarker research using multiplex immunoassay platforms. J Immunol Methods 386(1–2):22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2012.08.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng H, Hao B, Sun J, Yin M (2020) C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type II collagen as biomarker for radiological knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Cartilage 11(4):512–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603518798884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liem Y, Judge A, Li Y, Sharif M (2022) Biochemical, clinical, demographic and imaging biomarkers for disease progression in knee osteoarthritis. Biomark Med 16(8):633–645. https://doi.org/10.2217/bmm-2021-0579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jung M, Christgau S, Lukoschek M, Henriksen D, Richter W (2004) Increased urinary concentration of collagen type II C-telopeptide fragments in patients with osteoarthritis. Pathobiology 71(2):70–76. https://doi.org/10.1159/000074419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kraus VB, Collins JE, Hargrove D, Losina E, Nevitt M, Katz JN et al. (2017) Predictive validity of biochemical biomarkers in knee osteoarthritis: data from the FNIH OA Biomarkers Consortium. Ann Rheum Dis 76(1):186–195. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hsu YH, Hsieh MS, Liang YC, Li CY, Sheu MT, Chou DT et al. (2004) Production of the chemokine eotaxin-1 in osteoarthritis and its role in cartilage degradation. J Cell Biochem 93(5):929–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.20239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li B, Zhang YL, Yu SY (2019) Synovial fluid eotaxin-1 levels may reflect disease progression in primary knee osteoarthritis among elderly Han Chinese: a cross-sectional study. Cartilage 10(4):408–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603518764280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chao PZ, Hsieh MS, Cheng CW, Lin YF, Chen CH (2011) Regulation of MMP-3 expression and secretion by the chemokine eotaxin-1 in human chondrocytes. J Biomed Sci 18(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-18-86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Galicia K, Thorson C, Banos A, Rondina M, Hopkinson W, Hoppensteadt D et al. (2018) Inflammatory biomarker profiling in total joint arthroplasty and its relevance to circulating levels of lubricin, a novel proteoglycan. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 24(6):950–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029618765090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruan G, Ding C (2020) Correction to: associations between serumIL-8 and knee symptoms, joint structures, and cartilage or bone biomarkers in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 39(7):2249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05182-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Koh SM, Chan CK, Teo SH, Singh S, Merican A, Ng WM et al. (2020) Elevated plasma and synovial fluid interleukin-8 and interleukin-18 may be associated with the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis. Knee 27(1):26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.10.028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun JM, Sun LZ, Liu J, Su BH, Shi L (2013) Serum interleukin-15 levels are associated with severity of pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Dis Markers 35(3):203–206. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/176278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Scanzello CR, Umoh E, Pessler F, Diaz-Torne C, Miles T, Dicarlo E et al. (2009) Local cytokine profiles in knee osteoarthritis: elevated synovial fluid interleukin-15 differentiates early from end-stage disease. Osteoarthr Cartil 17(8):1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2009.02.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sokolove J, Lepus CM (2013) Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: latest findings and interpretations. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 5(2):77–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X12467868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2022R1I1A1A01071458) and by the Korean government (MSIT; NRF-2022R1H1A2091519). The funding sources did not have any influence on study design collection, on analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ji-Sun Shin and Hyobeom Lee contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 7, Keunjaebong-gil, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, 18450, Republic of Korea

    Ji-Sun Shin, Seong Hyeon Kim, Kyu-Cheol Noh, Sung Jae Kim & Si Young Song

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, 150, Seongan-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05355, Republic of Korea

    Hyobeom Lee

  3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 1, Singil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07441, Republic of Korea

    Hyong Nyun Kim

  4. School of Advanced Materials Science & Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, Republic of Korea

    Jae‑Young Choi

Authors
  1. Ji-Sun Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyobeom Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seong Hyeon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kyu-Cheol Noh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sung Jae Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hyong Nyun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jae‑Young Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Si Young Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JSS: Conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, and writing—original draft; HL: Investigation, formal analysis, and writing—original draft; SHK: Resources and formal analysis; KCN: Investigation, writing—review, and editing; SJK: Resources, writing—review, and editing; HNK: Investigation and formal analysis; JYC: Resources and conceptualization; SYS: Conceptualization, project administration, supervision, writing—review, and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Si Young Song.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital (IRB No. HDT 2020-06-026-001). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and control subjects prior to inclusion in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, JS., Lee, H., Kim, S.H. et al. Identification of plasma and urinary inflammatory markers in severe knee osteoarthritis: Relations with synovial fluid markers. Knee Surg & Relat Res 36, 19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-024-00223-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-024-00223-8

Keywords

Knee Surgery & Related Research

ISSN: 2234-2451