Skip to main content

Analysis of changes in tibial torsion angle on open-wedge high tibial osteotomy depending on the osteotomy level



This study evaluated the tibial torsional angle changes of 72 knees before and after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and compared the results according to the osteotomy level.

Materials and methods

Seventy patients (72 knees) with Kellgren–Lawrence grade 3 underwent OWHTO. Demographic data, operation procedures, and measurement of mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA), anatomical tibiofemoral angle (aTFA), tibial torsional angle (TTA), and pre- and postoperative Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were obtained. The authors analyzed TTA changes between 30 knees with high-level osteotomy (group A) and 42 knees with low-level osteotomy (group B).


The changes of TTAs in the subjects of 72 knees went from 29.26 ± 5.6° preoperative mean to 25.36 ± 6.4° postoperative mean (p = 0.032). The postoperative TTAs of group A (mean 27.4 ± 4.8°) and B (mean 25.7 ± 4.9°) were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Preoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores of 72 knees had means of 49.1 ± 3.5 and 49.0 ± 15.2, respectively, and postoperative means of 85.7 ± 8.56 and 78.0 ± 17.6, respectively, which were statistically significant (p < 0.01).


Changes of TTA with internal rotation of distal tibia were observed following OWHTO. High-level osteotomy on the proximal tibia’s lateral cortex had less internal rotation of the distal tibia than low-level osteotomy.


Medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is a widely recognized surgical treatment option for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis accompanied with varus malalignment [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Achieving accurate alignment correction following OWHTO is detrimental to successful clinical outcomes. However, surgeons have previously focused on coronal plane correction and disregarded any possible changes on either the sagittal or axial plane during OWHTO [7]. Moreover, to date, OWHTO-associated rotational malalignment has not been appropriately addressed, and limited studies have discussed changes in the axial tibial rotation following OWHTO [8, 9]. However, studies demonstrating the occurrence of unintentional secondary distal tibial rotational changes during OWHTO have recently emerged [10]. As the internal rotation of the distal tibia with the proximal fragment commonly occur after OWHTO [11], excessive changes in the tibial torsional angle (TTA) may adversely interrupt the bone union after osteotomy and affect clinical results, including gait pattern and patellar tracking. Therefore, such changes could eventually lead to an increased risk of patellofemoral osteoarthritis [12].

Standard plain radiographs have failed to successfully evaluate such change in rotation [9]. This study measured the TTA, an angle formed by the axis through the posterior tangent of the widest proximal tibial condyles to the transverse axis that bisects the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the lower end of the tibia and passes through the anterior half of the lateral malleolus in the axial plane, using computed tomography (CT) (Fig. 1) [13]. CT imaging of all knees were obtained from 2 mm CT scan cuts from both proximal and distal tibia. The decrease in the TTA shows an increased internal rotation of the tibia [14].

Fig. 1
figure 1

A change in tibial torsion angle (TTA) pre- and postoperation on axial computed tomography was measured. TTA, an angle formed by the axis through the posterior tangent of the widest proximal tibial condyles to the transverse axis that bisects the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the lower end of the tibia and passes through the anterior half of the lateral malleolus in the axial plane, using computed tomography (CT)

This study aims to assess the TTA changes before and after OWHTO. TTA changes were verified and divided into the lateral cortical osteotomy lines above the fibula’s tip and those below the fibula’s tip. Based on prior clinical observations, it was hypothesized that OWHTO could change the TTA result in the distal tibia’s internal rotation in relation to the proximal tibia.

Materials and methods

The study commenced after the approval of the Institutional Review Board. CT images were evaluated in 70 patients (72 knees) with varus malalignments of Kellgren–Lawrence grade 3 with varus medial compartmental lesion. Patients were retrospectively enrolled and underwent biplane medial OWHTO between June 2016 and March 2019. An orthopedic surgeon performed the OWHTO. The presence of meniscal tears as operative indications was not considered. This study’s ineligibility criteria were Kellgren–Lawrence grade 3 with concomitant lateral compartmental OA, Kellgren–Lawrence grade 3 with presence of normal aligned lower extremity with proximal tibia vara, rheumatoid arthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, infectious arthritis, peroneal nerve injury, lateral hinge fracture, nonunion of the osteotomy site, and revision high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The mean age of the sample population was 60.8 ± 5.1 years. The sample was composed of 48 female and 22 male participants, with a mean BMI of 25.87 ± 5.8 kg/m2. The average follow-up period was 26.3 months, and the degrees of lower extremity deformity of the patients showed varus 6.1 ± 2.2° (Table 1). All knees were radiographically and clinically assessed before and after the surgery.

Table 1 Patient demographics

Surgical technique

Preoperative planning was done through standing anteroposterior (AP) long bone, standing AP, and lateral knee joint radiograph evaluation. The osteotomy site, correction angle, and osteotomy gap size were measured using the method described by Miniaci et al. [15]. The articular cartilage status, menisci, and cruciate ligaments underwent a diagnostic arthroscopy assessment afterward. In the process, meniscal procedures, including repair or meniscectomy, were performed as necessary.

An approximately 7 cm anteromedial vertical skin incision was made approximately two-finger breaths medial to the tibial tuberosity. A sharp dissection exposed the sartorial fascia, and the pes anserinus tendon was distally retracted. The medial collateral ligament’s distal fibers were accessed and distally released. A Barret retractor was inserted to protect the neurovascular structure between the exposed medial collateral ligament and the tibia’s posteromedial side. Afterward, a vertical release through the fascia of the medial collateral ligament, pes anserinus, and posteromedial capsule (Fig. 2a, b) without incision was performed. Two 2.0 K-wires were used as guide wires. The first 2.0 K-wire was under fluoroscopic control and inserted into the fibula tip anteriorly, and the second 2.0 K-wire was inserted parallel to the tibial slope. To avoid the proximal migration of the osteotomy into the joint, osteotomy was performed immediately distal to the guidewire. The biplane osteotomy’s oblique osteotomy began from the medial tibial cortex and to the level around the fibular head’s tip (Fig. 3). Osteotomies advanced to approximately 1 cm medial of lateral cortex without breakage using a controlled fluoroscopic guidance system. The biplane osteotomy’s vertical osteotomy was performed on the tibial tuberosity’s posterior aspect to avoid traumatizing the patellar tendon’s bony insertion.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The hamstring tendon was cautiously exposed after facial incision and vertical release of the distal tendon insertion’s detachment. b The medial collateral ligament’s distal fibers were exposed and released distally between the exposed medial collateral ligament and the tibia’s posteromedial side

Fig. 3
figure 3

The targeted osteotomy line around the tip of the fibular head was routinely made on all operations. The osteotomy line above the tip of the fibula can lead to nonunion or condyle fracture

A gap spreader was used to open the osteotomy site, and then a metal block was inserted. The osteotomy site was gradually opened with caution to the planned width using chisels to avoid lateral cortical damage. The osteotomy site’s stability was maintained using a fixed angle plate with a locking screw (Viper Fix®: SI Medisys, Goyang, Republic of Korea, n = 72). The fixation was performed on a partially flexed knee joint.

Radiological evaluation

Radiological evaluation was performed using weight-bearing AP, knee joint lateral views, and CT scans of the lower extremities [13, 16, 17]. Radiographs were taken the day before and 3 months after the operation. Moreover, CT scans were done 2 weeks after the operation. In this study, the radiological parameters accounted for were the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA), the anatomical tibiofemoral angle (aTFA), and the TTA (Fig. 1).

Based on the radiographs, the patients were divided into two groups: one group (group A) with the lateral cortical osteotomy lines above the tip of the fibula (aTTA, 30 knees) and another (group B) with the lateral cortical osteotomy lines below the tip of the fibula (bTTA, 42 knees Fig. 4a, b). Clinical analysis was performed through the comparison of the preoperative and postoperative Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. The collective data was gathered using Microsoft Excel 2010 version (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and presented as mean ± standard deviation. Pre- and postoperative comparisons of the mTFA, aTFA, and TTA were made using paired t-tests, and Student’s t-test was used to compare aTTA and bTTA. All obtained statistical data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., IL, USA).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Immediate postoperative anteroposterior (AP) view radiography of the knee after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). Patients were categorized into two groups: a A lateral cortical osteotomy line above the tip of the fibula and b a lateral cortical osteotomy line below the tip of the fibula


Three different individuals measured the radiographic parameters. Measurements were repeated once by each examiner, and mean values between the two were calculated to minimize measurement errors. Interobserver reliability assessment was performed using Winner’s criteria [18]. Reliability was categorized by intraclass correlation coefficient as absent-to-poor (0.00–0.24), low (0.25–0.49), fair-to-moderate (0.50–0.69), good (0.70–0.89), or excellent (0.90–1.0). Interobserver reliability was 0.94.

The mTFAs were corrected from preoperative mean varus 6.1 ± 2.2° to postoperative mean valgus 1.38 ± 2.7°, showing statistical significance (p = 0.021). The mean preoperative and postoperative aTFAs were varus 0.26 ± 1.4° and valgus 6.53 ± 1.9°, respectively, showing statistical significance (p = 0.016). Except for four knees, most of the cases were internally rotated postoperatively. The changes of TTAs in 72 knees were from preoperative mean 29.26 ± 5.6° to postoperative mean 25.36 ± 6.4°, showing statistical significance (p = 0.032).

The changes of TTA in group A (30 knees) went from preoperative mean 29.6 ± 4.4° to postoperative mean 27.4 ± 4.8°, showing statistical significance (p = 0.041). The changes of TTA in group B (42 knees) went from preoperative mean 29.6 ± 5.3° to postoperative mean 25.7 ± 4.9°, showing statistical significance (p = 0.024; Table 2). The difference between preoperative aTTAs and preoperative bTTAs was not statistically significant (p = 0.741), but the difference between postoperative aTTA (27.4 ± 4.8°) and postoperative bTTA (25.7 ± 4.9°) was statistically significant (p < 0.01; Table 3). The mean preoperative and postoperative Lysholm scores of 72 knees were 49.1 ± 3.5 and 85.7 ± 8.6, respectively, and they were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The mean preoperative and postoperative IKDC scores of 72 knees were 49.0 ± 15.2 and 78.0 ± 17.6, respectively, and they were statistically significant (p < 0.01; Table 4). However, postoperative Lysholm scores of aTTAs and bTTAs (87.4 ± 8.2 and 83.1 ± 9.6, respectively) showed no statistical significance (p = 0.917) (Table 5). Also, postoperative IKDC scores of aTTAs and bTTAs (82.0 ± 12.2 and 75.2 ± 16.8, respectively) showed no statistical significance (p = 0.893) (Table 6).

Table 2 Radiological results
Table 3 Comparison of aTTAs and bTTAs
Table 4 Clinical results
Table 5 Comparison of Lysholm scores of a TTAs and bTTAs
Table 6 Comparison of IKDC scores of aTTAs and bTTAs


The most significant finding of this study was the noticeable change in TTAs following biplane medial OWHTO. According to Jacobi et al. [10], possible factors that influence the change in TTAs during OWHTO are variable stability of the lateral hinge, variable tension of posterior soft tissues, and other unidentified reasons. The presence of osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral joint was mostly a detrimental factor, which could lead to posterior soft tissue contracture and contribute to the decreased tibial rotation. The extent of correction performed was another parameter affecting tibial rotation change. The larger the extent of the correction, the higher the likelihood of changes for tibial rotation. For patients with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) degeneration, small correction changes will derive an extensive change in TTA. The ACL resists not only the motions of anterior tibial translation but also those of internal tibial rotation. The other factor that could have influenced the results was the position of the knee, whether flexion or extension, during the procedure, as changes to the internal rotation were more pronounced in extension than in flexion.

Hinterwimmer et al. [11] stated that two anatomical conditions might lead to a significant tibial rotation. First, the medial soft tissue structures may play a role leading to a tibial rotation. In OWHTO, the pes anserinus is posteromedially retracted, and the insertion of the semitendinosus tendon is maintained distal to the osteotomy. ‟During OWHTO, when the osteotomy site is opened and the osteotomy is performed, these tendons’ increased tension may lead to an internal tibial rotation.”

‟Second, this is due to the complex three-dimensional anatomy of the proximal tibia during osteotomy.” ‟The operation’s objective is to redistribute the force on the tibiofemoral joint with valgisation of the distal tibia.” ‟Moreover, lateral column preservation is crucial to the primary stability of the osteotomy gap.” ‟Proper preparation of soft tissue at the posterior aspect of the tibia is required to preserve the lateral column.” However, concerns regarding muscle and neurovascular injuries could lead to improper preparation [11]. Therefore, the posterior and posterior-lateral cortex’s osteotomy is not performed with ease because it can lead to a misguided hinge axis direction [19].The variation in distinct hinge axis location and direction may influence the distal tibial rotation [20].

‟There are numerous methods to assess the tibial torsional angle, including clinical, anthropometric, and cadaveric skeletal measurement and imaging techniques, including CT, fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasonography.” ‟Nowadays, tibial torsion assessment using a CT scan is considered an accurate and reliable golden method” [13]. The examiner has to calculate the angle between the tibia’s proximal and distal articular axis in the transverse computerized tomograms [17] to assess tibial torsion. Decreased TTA can be interpreted as the internal rotation of the tibia’s distal fragment, and increased TTA can be interpreted as external rotation [16].

Because the tibia is a three-dimensional triangular shape, if the lateral end of osteotomy was above the fibula tip, it will yield a larger surface area than below the fibula’s tip, leading to a significant difference inTTA. Compared with the larger surface area, the angle change will be greater in the smaller surface area, even if the same amount of rotation is applied. As stated above, the same result is observed in this study. By performing lateral osteotomy above the fibula’s tip, the tibia’s distal fragment was significantly less internally rotated than when performing lateral osteotomy below the fibula’s tip.

With regards to clinical scores, both mean preoperative and postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores of 72 knees showed statistically significant differences. However, clinical scores of posteoperative aTTAs and bTTAs did not show the statistically significant differences. Even though the clinical scores of postoperative aTTAs and bTTAs did not show significant difference compared with bTTAs, better clinical results were shown in aTTAs. This can be interpreted as the slight changes of such rotations: patients’ clinical symptoms have been improved due to the correction of alignment, which transfers the mechanical loading from the affected medial compartment to the healthy lateral compartment [1,2,3,4,5,6].

There are numerous factors that may influence the internal rotation of distal tibia in this study. Improper externally rotated ankle position during osteotomy and plate fixation, soft tissue dissection and releasement, and the angle between the oblique and vertical osteotomy plane are thought to be critical.

This limitations of this study should be noted, such as the very small number of patients enrolled in this study. Moreover, although education of patients regarding the lower limb position during radiographic evaluations was done beforehand, the measurements evaluated using radiographs and CT images are two-dimensional, and the influence of limb position and scanning direction on the collected data cannot be ignored.


The open-wedge high tibial osteotomy showed statistically significant changes in the tibial torsional angle, such as the distal tibia’s internal rotation regarding the proximal tibia. A lateral osteotomy level higher than fibular tip on the proximal tibia’s lateral cortex presents significantly lower chances of internal rotation of the distal tibia.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy


Mechanical tibiofemoral angle


Anatomical tibiofemoral angle


Tibial torsional angle


International Knee Documentation Committee




Computed tomography




High tibial osteotomy


Anterior cruciate ligament


Magnetic resonance imaging


  1. Lee DC, Byun SJ (2012) High tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res 24:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amendola A, Fowler PJ, Litchfield R, Kirkley S, Clatworthy M (2004) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy using a novel technique: early results and complications. J Knee Surg 17:164–169

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Insall J, Shoji H, Mayer V (1974) High tibial osteotomy. A five-year evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1397–1405

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jakob RP, Murphy SB (1992) Tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: indication, planning, and operative technique. Instr Course Lect 41:87–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koshino T, Murase T, Saito T (2003) Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with use of porous hydroxyapatite to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Hewett TE (2000) High tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction for varus angulated anterior cruciate ligament anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 28:282–296

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hohmann E, Bryant A, Imhoff AB (2006) The effect of closed wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slope: a radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:454–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jang KM, Lee JH, Park HJ, Kim JL, Han SB (2016) Unintended rotational changes of the distal tibia after biplane medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Arthroplasty 31:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kendoff D, Lo D, Goleski P, Warkentine B, O’Loughlin PF, Pearle AD (2008) Open wedge tibial osteotomies influence on axial rotation and tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:904–910

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobi M, Villa V, Reischi N, Demey G, Goy D, Neyret P, Gautier E, Magnussen RA (2014) Factors influencing posterior tibial slope and tibial rotation in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2762–2768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinterwimmer S, Feucht MJ, Paul J, Kirchhoff C, Sauerschnig M, Imhoff AB, Beitzel K (2016) Analysis of the effects of high tibial osteotomy on tibial rotation. IntOrthop 40:1849–1854

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gaasbeek R, Welsing R, Barink M, Verdonschot N, van Kampen A (2007) The influence of open and closed high tibial osteotomy on dynamic patellar tracking: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:978–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jakob RP, Haertel M, Stüssi E (1980) Tibial torsion calculated by computerised tomography and compared to other methods of measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62-B:238–242

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Madadi F, Maleki A, Shamie AN, Washington ER 3rd, Yazadanshenas H (2015) A new method for tibial torsion measurement by computerized tomography. J Orthop 13:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miniaci A, Ballmer FT, Ballmer PM, Jakob RP (1989) Proximal tibial osteotomy. A new fixation device. Clin Orthop Relat Res 3:250–259

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stotts AK, Stevens PM (2009) Tibial rotational osteotomy with intramedullary nail fixation. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 4:129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Waidelich HA, Strecker W, Schneider E (1992) Computed tomographic torsion-angle and length measurement of the lower extremity. The methods, normal values and radiation load. Fortschr Geb Rongtenstr Nuklearmed. 157:245–251

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM (1991) Statistical principles in experimental design, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP (2004) Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 4:366–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang JH, Bae JH, Lim HC, Shon WY, Kim CW, Cho JW (2009) Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy: the effect of the cortical hinge on posterior tibial slope. Am J Sports Med 12:2411–2418

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge Dr. An and Dr. Go for their assistance in conducting the statistical analysis.


Not applicable.

Author information




ISS: Overall thesis direction and review; JHK: radiological and clinical evaluation, statistical interpretation. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to In-Soo Song.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Prior to conducting the study, research approval (DSH-인-21-01) was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. All participants were verbally assured of the purpose and process; written and informed consent was obtained after a full explanation about their participation. The researchers also explained to the participants their right to withdraw from the study at any time and for any reason and their right to confidentiality.

Consent for publication

All participants signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, IS., Kwon, J. Analysis of changes in tibial torsion angle on open-wedge high tibial osteotomy depending on the osteotomy level. Knee Surg & Relat Res 34, 17 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Knee
  • Kellgren–Lawrence grade 3 osteoarthritis
  • Tibial torsion angle
  • Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy
  • High level osteotomy