Table 6 PROMIS utilization as an outcome metric across total knee arthroplasty studies encompassed in this review
Author | Design | Pt population/intervention | F/U | Primary assessment | Main findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shaw et al. [24] | Prospective | TKA versus rTKA | 1 month, 4–8 months | Comparison of evidence of improvement MCID in rTKA compared with standard total knee arthroplasty TKA | rTKA demonstrated comparable MCID achievement to standard TKA; no statistically significant difference in MCID achievement between rTKA and standard TKA |
Frye et al. [28] | Prospective | TKA: MC versus CR versus PS | 3 months, 12 months | Medial congruent polyethylene (MC) effect on patient outcomes after TKA | MC bearing resulted in similar or improved PROMIS, ROM, and patient satisfaction |
Melnic et al. [26] | Retrospective | TKA | 12 months | Comparison between patient-reported mental health and postoperative physical function following TKA | Patients with worse PROMIS GMH scores had worse PROMIS PF scores before and after surgery |
Nwanko et al. [29] | Prospective | TKA | 3 months | Preoperative resilience effect on 3-month postoperative outcomes | Resilience predicts postoperative knee function and general physical health in patients undergoing TKA |
Lawrie et al. [31] | Retrospective | TKA | 12 months | Feasibility and responsiveness of PROMIS in bundle payment care improvement patients undergoing TKA | PROMIS PF domain showed utility in assessing baseline status and changes in PROs over time in patients undergoing TKA, irrespective of insurance status |