Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of studies stratifying outcomes according to presence of FTE

From: Does medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction result in femoral tunnel enlargement? A systematic review

Parameter

Berard et al., 2013

Schüttler et al., 2018

Group

FTE (n = 23)

Non-FTE (n = 32)

P-value

FTE (n = 23)

Non-FTE (n = 28)

P-value

Sex distribution (males, females)

NR

NR

NR

11, 12

6, 22

NS

BMI (kg/m2)

23.2

21.8

0.12

24.2

25.2

NS

Age (years)

24.4

24.5

0.97

20.6

24.3

NS

% with no trochlear dysplasia

4.3

6.2

0.14

4.3

21.4

NS

Presence of patella alta

52.2

28.2

0.09

NR

NR

NR

C-D index

1.17

1.08

0.03

1.0

1.0

NS

% Femoral tunnel malpositioned

43.5

34.4

0.58

AP: 26

PD: 87

AP: 32

PD: 46

AP: NS

PD: 0.0033

% with Increased TT-TG distance (> 20 mm)

8.7

9.4

0.69

8.7

14.3

NS

TT-TG distance (mm)

16.2

15.4

0.57

14.8

13.0

NS

Patients with recurrent subluxation/dislocation

1

2

1.0

1

0

NS

Knee flexion

NR

NR

NR

137°

136°

NS

% with cartilage damage

NR

NR

NR

39%

25%

NS

Patients with positive apprehension test post-op

NR

NR

NR

3

1

NS

  1. FTE femoral tunnel enlargement, BMI body mass index, NS not statistically significant, NR not reported, C-D Caton-Deschamps, AP anterior posterior, PD proximal–distal, TT–TG tibial tubercle–tibial groove