Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of lesion location and size (mm2) between osteochondral and chondral defects

From: Comparison of clinical outcomes following osteochondral allograft transplantation for osteochondral versus chondral defects in the knee

 

Osteochondral

Chondral

P-value

Medial femoral condyle

23 (74.2%), 501.28 ± 343.33 mm2

49 (45.0%), 487.55 ± 240.71 mm2

0.865

Lateral femoral condyle

4 (12.9%), 476.56 ± 96.34 mm2

17 (15.6%), 443.13 ± 286.03 mm2

0.825

Patella

2 (6.5%), 412.00 ± 124.45 mm2

24 (22.0%), 391.50 ± 193.34 mm2

0.886

Medial trochlea

1 (3.2%), 625.00 ± 0.00 mm2

11 (10.1%), 259.70 ± 150.28 mm2

–

Lateral trochlea

1 (3.2%), 450.00 ± 0.00 mm2

8 (7.3%), 308.25 ± 111.34 mm2

–

  1. Results reported as mean ± standard deviation. −Indicates group sizes are too small for adequate comparison between groups
Back to article page

Knee Surgery & Related Research

ISSN: 2234-2451