Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of clinical outcomes for studies included in the systematic review

From: Management of mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament: a systematic review

Study Outcome score Preop average Postop average Preop ROM deficit (patient %) Postop ROM deficit (patient %) Positive Lachman % Positive Pivot % Symptomatic instability %
Ventura, 2018 [19] Lysholm
IKDC
VAS
47
27
8 (6–10)
85 (65–99)
81 (56–87)
2 (0–3)
100% flexion deficit
16% extension deficit
23.3° average improvement 100% 0 NR
Srivastava, 2016 [15] Lysholm NR 87.2 (85–95) 100% flexion deficit 0% 16 0 0
Pandey, 2014 [13] Lysholm NR 89.5 (85–95) 63% flexion deficit 0% 72 0 0
Cha, 2013 [6] Lysholm 50 83 53% flexion deficit
82% extension deficit
3%
7%
10 6 5.8
Morice, 2013 [17] IKDC
KOOS
NR
NR
81 (45–97)
88 (56–99)
95% flexion deficit 13% 17 NR 0
Chudasama, 2012 [14] IKDC 33.6 73.2 20% extension deficit 0% 70 10 0
Lintz, 2010 [3] IKDC
KOOS
NR
NR
71 (42–92)
78 (26–99)
48% flexion deficit 21° average improvement 62 27.5 48.2 (2 delayed ACL reconstruction)
Kim, 2008 [16] VAS 6.1 1.4 22% flexion deficit
78% flexion deficit
8%
14%
All firm end point NR 0
Khanna, 2016 [18] IKDC 36.3 73.1 92% flexion deficit
8% extension deficit
NR NR NR 0
  1. Preop Preoperative, Postop Postoperative, ROM Range of motion, NR Not reported, IKDC International Knee Documentation Committee, KOOS Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, VAS Visual analogue scale, ACL Anterior cruciate ligament