Table 4 Summary of clinical outcomes for studies included in the systematic review
From: Management of mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament: a systematic review
Study | Outcome score | Preop average | Postop average | Preop ROM deficit (patient %) | Postop ROM deficit (patient %) | Positive Lachman % | Positive Pivot % | Symptomatic instability % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ventura, 2018 [19] | Lysholm IKDC VAS | 47 27 8 (6–10) | 85 (65–99) 81 (56–87) 2 (0–3) | 100% flexion deficit 16% extension deficit | 23.3° average improvement | 100% | 0 | NR |
Srivastava, 2016 [15] | Lysholm | NR | 87.2 (85–95) | 100% flexion deficit | 0% | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Pandey, 2014 [13] | Lysholm | NR | 89.5 (85–95) | 63% flexion deficit | 0% | 72 | 0 | 0 |
Cha, 2013 [6] | Lysholm | 50 | 83 | 53% flexion deficit 82% extension deficit | 3% 7% | 10 | 6 | 5.8 |
Morice, 2013 [17] | IKDC KOOS | NR NR | 81 (45–97) 88 (56–99) | 95% flexion deficit | 13% | 17 | NR | 0 |
Chudasama, 2012 [14] | IKDC | 33.6 | 73.2 | 20% extension deficit | 0% | 70 | 10 | 0 |
Lintz, 2010 [3] | IKDC KOOS | NR NR | 71 (42–92) 78 (26–99) | 48% flexion deficit | 21° average improvement | 62 | 27.5 | 48.2 (2 delayed ACL reconstruction) |
Kim, 2008 [16] | VAS | 6.1 | 1.4 | 22% flexion deficit 78% flexion deficit | 8% 14% | All firm end point | NR | 0 |
Khanna, 2016 [18] | IKDC | 36.3 | 73.1 | 92% flexion deficit 8% extension deficit | NR | NR | NR | 0 |