Skip to main content

Table 2 The occurrence and clinical effects of FTE following MPFLR

From: Does medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction result in femoral tunnel enlargement? A systematic review

Study

Criteria for FTE

FTE

Clinical effect of FTE

Turgay et al., 2017

Not reported

12 (38.7%) patients experienced femoral tunnel enlargement, and 75% of these patients had proximal tunnel misplacement. Of the 19 (61.3%) patients without femoral tunnel expansion, only 32% had proximal tunnel misplacement

There were no differences in Tegner, Kujala, and IKDC scores in patients with and without femoral tunnel enlargement

Schüttler et al., 2018

Increase to more than double of the femoral tunnel’s original area in at least two of its sections

A total of 23 (45.1%) knees experienced FTE

Patients with FTE displayed significantly better outcomes in terms of symptoms and performance of daily activities according to the Kujala (84 vs. 75, p = 0.032) and IKDC (80 vs. 71, p = 0.024) scores, but not as measured with the Tegner score (4.2 vs 3.9)

Berard et al., 2013

Increase to more than double of the femoral tunnel’s original area

Of the 55 patients, 23 (41.8%) experienced FTE

The mean cross-sectional area of the tunnel in the non-enlarged group was 57.9 mm2, compared with 105 mm2 in the enlarged group (P < .001)

IKDC scores did not differ between patients with and without FTE (82.6 vs 83.0, respectively, p = 0.93). There was no difference in risk of patellar instability between both groups (p = 1.0)

Neri et al., 2019

Percentage increase in tunnel cross-sectional area from baseline was calculated

Number of patients experiencing FTE were not reported. Degree of FTE was not reported. Malposition of the femoral tunnel was correlated with FTE

FTE predicted lower functional scores. Increases in femoral tunnel area at 5 mm, 15 mm, and 25 mm from the medial femoral cortex were negatively associated with post-operative Kujala and IKDC scores (− 0.535 and − 0.557, − 0.331 and − 0.296, − 0.218 and − 0.193, respectively)

Kita et al., 2017

Percentage increase in the aperture and inside the tunnel cross-sectional area from baseline was calculated

Cross sectional area at the aperture increased from 21.7 mm2 at 3 weeks to 30.3 mm2 1-year post-op (41.1% increase, p > 0.05). Area 5 mm from the aperture increased from 21.9 to 23.8 mm2 (8.8% increase, p > 0.05), and area 10 mm from the aperture increased from 22.1 to 22.7 mm2 (2.6% increase, p > 0.05)

Femoral tunnel enlargement was not associated with post-operative Kujala scores (r = − 0.015, p = 0.946)

Wong et al., 2021

Calculated by subtracting the size of the screw used from the measured opening tunnel size

Mean increase in femoral tunnel size was 2.5 mm

Not reported

Qin et al., 2017

Increase in femoral tunnel width at 3 days and last follow-up was measured

At the last follow-up, there were 54 knees with tunnel enlargement (77.1%), and 16 without (22.9%). Femoral tunnel width was 8.7 mm at 3 days, and 10.6 mm at last follow-up. There was a 21.8% increase (p < 0.05)

Average Kujala score was 82.5 in patients with FTE, compared to 79.4 in those without (p = 0.386). Lysholm score was 84.8 in patients with FTE, compared to 78.6 in those without (p = 0.085)

  1. FTE femoral tunnel enlargement, IKDC international knee documentation committee