Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of studies included

From: Does medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction result in femoral tunnel enlargement? A systematic review

Study

Level of evidence (study design), risk of bias

Graft used

Type of patellar instability

Number of patients (males, females)

Number of knees

Patient age (years)

Follow-up duration

Imaging method

Turgay et al., 2017

4 (case series), NFT

Gracilis tendon graft (whether auto- or allograph not reported)

NR

31 (8, 23)

31

Not reported

4.1 years

MRI

Schüttler et al., 2018

4 (case series), high

Gracilis tendon autograft

NR

49

51

22.6

3 years

MRI

Berard et al., 2013

3 (case control), low

Gracilis tendon autograft

Episodic patellar dislocations

51 (14, 37)

55

24.2

3.7 years

Lateral X-ray

Neri et al., 2019

4 (case series), high

Gracilis tendon graft (whether auto- or allograph not reported)

Recurrent dislocations (> 2)

107

112

25

4.9 years

3D CT

Kita et al., 2017

4 (case series), high

Semitendinosus tendon autograft

Recurrent dislocations

23 (6, 17)

23

24

2 years

3D CT

Wong et al., 2021

4 (case series), some concerns

30 allographs (18 semitendinosus, 12 gracilis), 6 autographs (3 semitendinosus, 1 quadriceps, 2 gracilis)

16 had recurrent dislocations. Type of instability not reported in remaining 22

38 (16, 22)

38

20.4

2.5 years

MRI

Qin et al., 2017

4 (case series), some concerns

Gracilis tendon autograft

Recurrent dislocations

66 (18, 48)

70

24.3

20.9 months

CT

  1. NR not reported, NFT non-full text article, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, 3D CT three-dimensional computerize tomography