Skip to main content

Table 4 Study characteristics and details

From: What is the best prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in Asians following total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and network meta-analysis

 

Prophylaxis type

Reported primary outcomes

Reported secondary outcomes

Mun Hon Low et al. 2013 [14]

LMWH (n = 72)

NOAC (n = 15)

US

Major

Takeshi Fuji et al. 2012 [18]

LMWH (n = 66)

NOAC (n = 152)

V, C

Minor, major

Jain et al. 2004 [19]

NP (n = 26)

US, C

None

Yeo et al. 2016 [20]

MOP (n = 802)

C

None

Ko et al. 2003[4]

NP (n = 58)

US

None

Intiyanaravut et al. 2017 [21]

LMWH (n = 25)

NP (n = 25)

US, C

Minor, major

Leizorovicz et al. 2005 [22]

NP (n = 944)

C

Major

Cho et al. 2013 [15]

MOP (n = 74)

US

Minor, major

Won et al. 2011 [23]

NP (n = 440)

US

None

Kim et al. 2015[24]

MOP (n = 874)

V, US

None

Wang et al. 2004 [16]

LMWH (n = 50)

NP (n = 51)

V, C

None

Pookarnjanamorakot et al. 2004 [25]

NP (n = 67)

V, C

None

Chen et al. 2008 [26]

NP (n = 78)

V, C

None

Chin et al. 2009 [27]

LMWH (n = 110)

MOP (n = 220)

NP (n = 110)

U

Minor, major

  1. V, venography; US, ultrasound; C, clinical diagnosis; major, major bleeding; minor, minor bleeding