Skip to main content

Table 5 Failures

From: Failure rates and clinical outcomes of synthetic meniscal implants following partial meniscectomy: a systematic review

 

Paper

Failures/patients

M/L

 

Actifit

Leroy [19]

3/15 (16.7%)

3/0

Removal of implant

 

Dhollander [20]

14/44 (31.8%)

8/6

Three removals of the scaffold, five conversions to a meniscal transplant, four converted to UKR, two converted to TKR

 

Toanen [16]

23/137 (16.8%)

NR

Ten scaffolds broke, seven were converted to meniscal allografts, four converted to UKR, two converted to TKR

 

Monllau [22]

3/32 (9.4%)

NR

Removal of scaffold

 

Filardo [23]

1/16 (6.3%)

NR

Need for re-operation due to symptoms related to index defect

Total

 

44/244 (18.0%)

  

CMI

Zaffagnini [19]

2/17 (11.8%)

2/0

Re-operation

 

Steadman [20]

0/8 (0%)

n/a

Complications related to implant

 

Zaffagnini [21]

0/8 (0%)

n/a

Not recorded

 

Bulgheroni [22]

NR

n/a

Not recorded

 

Bulgheroni [23]

2/34 (5.9%)

2/0

Implant failure, or dissolved

 

Monllau [24]

2/25 (8%)

2/0

Infection or mechanical failure of implant

Total

 

6/92 (6.5%)

  

NUsurface

McKeon [9]

11/65(16.9%)

11/0

Further surgery: three device repositioning, three replacement of device, two removals, one UKA, two unplanned arthroscopies