Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary: the characteristics of included studies

From: Platelet-rich plasma injection in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Trial and location

Participants

Average age (years)

Male:female ratio

Design

Minimum follow-up (months)

Intervention/treatment details

PRP injection site

Co-intervention

Outcome measured

Adverse events

Scott et al. 2019 [16]

Multicenter: [USA, Norway, and Italy

57 persons (athletes) with patellar tendinopathy (Blazina stage IIIB) with symptoms ≥ 6 month

32 

6:1

Randomized, multicenter, prospective,

single-blind

12

Group 1: Single injection of 3.5 ml of LR-PRP (USG) (n = 19)

Group 2: Single injection of 3.5 ml of LP-PRP (USG) (n = 19)

Group 3: Single injection of 3.5 ml of NS (USG) (n = 19)

Patellar tendon (at the site of the lesion)

All persons, irrespective of group, received strengthening exercises (concentric and eccentric) in a gym-based rehabilitation program: 3 times per week for 6 weeks

VISA-P (knee function and activities), NPRS (pain intensity);

GRoC

No serious adverse events

However, in Group 2, 1 person reported

increased localized patellar tendon pain that prevented the person from participating in the rehabilitation program following injection

Dragoo et al. 2014 [17]

California, USA

23 persons with patellar tendinopathy with symptoms ≥ 6 weeks

34

19:1

Randomized, single-center, prospective,

double-blind

6

Group 1: Single injection of US-guided LR-PRP (6 ml) with dry needling (n = 10)

Group 2: Single episode of US-guided dry needling (n = 10)

Patellar tendon (at the site of the lesion)

All persons, irrespective of group, received strengthening exercises (eccentric) and flexibility training throughout the study period

VISA (knee function and activities); VAS (pain intensity); SF-12 (QoL);

Tegner scale (activity score); Lysholm scale (function and stability)

No adverse events

Vetrano et al. 2013 [15]

Rome, Italy

46 persons (athletes) with patellar tendinopathy with symptoms ≥ 6 months (mean 18.9 months), un-responsive to previous non-operative treatment

26.9

4:1

Randomized, single-center, prospective, double-blind

12

Group 1: Two injections (2 ml / injection) of PRP over 2 weeks, both injections under USG (n = 23)

Group 2: Three sessions of ESWT at 48–72 h interval under USG (n = 23)

Patellar tendon (at the site of the lesion)

All persons, irrespective of group, received strengthening (isometric and eccentric) and stretching exercises for 2 weeks

VISA-P (knee function and activities); VAS (pain intensity)

Modified Blazina scale (treatment response)

No serious adverse events

However, in Group 1, 3 persons reported

increased localized patellar tendon pain and discomfort that gradually subsided following injection

In Group 2, persons reported transient reddening (no bruising) of the skin following treatment sessions

Rodas et al. 2021 [20]

Barcelona, Spain

20 persons with patellar tendinopathy with symptoms ≥ 4 months (mean 23.6 months) unresponsive to previous non-operative treatment

33.9 years

All males

Randomized, single-center, prospective, double-blind

12

Group 1: Two injections at an interval of 23 days [1st injection: NS; 2nd injection: BM-MSC suspended in 6 ml solution of Ringer lactate, 2% human albumin, and 5 Mm glucose) (n = 10)

Group 2: Two injections at an interval of 23 days [6 ml each] of LP-PRP (USG) (n = 10)

Patellar tendon (at the site of the lesion) and peritendinous (medial and external zone)

All persons, irrespective of group, received the same post-intervention rehabilitation protocol

VISA-P (knee function and activities); VAS (pain intensity); dynamometry (muscle function);000

USG (tendon thickness and vascularity); UTC; MRI

No serious adverse events

However, 1 person from each group reported increased pain (gradually subsided) following injection

Kaux et al. 2019 [18]

Belgium

33 sports persons with patellar tendinopathy with symptoms > 3 months, unresponsive to previous non-operative treatment

29.4

All males

Randomized, single-center, prospective study

3

Group 1: Single injection of US-guided LP- PRP (6 ml) (n = 18)

Group 2: Two episodes (1 week apart) of US-guided hyaluronic acid injections (n = 15)

Patellar tendon (at the site of the lesion)

All persons, irrespective of group, received the same rehabilitation program [strengthening and activity exercises (bicycle training)

VAS (Pain intensity); VISA-P (knee function and activities); aAlgometric scores; IKDC scores

No adverse events

Filardo et al. 2010 [19]

Bologna, Italy

31 persons with patellar tendinopathy (Blazina stage IIIB) with symptoms > 3 months and unresponsive to previous non-operative treatment

27.1

All males

Non-randomized, single-center, prospective, open level

6

Group 1: Three injections (5 ml each) of PRP at an interval of 15 days (n = 15) and PT (exercise program)

Group 2: No active interventions, only PT (exercise program) (n = 16)

Patellar tendon (at the site of the lesion)

All persons, irrespective of group, received the same rehabilitation program [stretching, strengthening, and activity exercises (bicycle training)

VAS (pain intensity); EQ-VAS (QoL); Tegner scale (activity score)

No adverse events

Abdelbary et al. 2018 [21]

Cairo, Egypt

20 persons with patellar tendinopathy with symptoms ≥ 3 months and unresponsive to previous non-operative treatment

35.8

1:3

Non-randomized, single-center, prospective, double-blind

12

Group 1: Single injection (6 ml) of PRP under USG

Group 2: Single injection of high-volume injection treatment (10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine + 25 mg hydrocortisone + 30 ml NS under USG guidance

Patellar tendon (at the site of the lesion)

All persons, irrespective of group, received the same structured rehabilitation program

VAS (pain intensity)

No adverse events

Abate et al. 2018 [22]

Chieti, Italy

54 persons with patellar tendinopathy with symptoms ≥ 3 months (mean 11 months)

38.3

1:1

Non-randomized, retrospective, cohort study, open level

6

Group 1: Two injections (4-5 ml each) of PRP, at an interval of 2 weeks, under USG (n = 18)

Group 2: Two injections of high-volume injection treatment (10 ml of 2% mepivacaine + 30 ml NS), at an interval of 2 weeks under USG (n = 18)

Group 3: Two injections of high-volume injection treatment (10 ml of 2% mepivacaine + 30 ml NS) and 4-5 ml of PRP injections, at an interval of 2 weeks, under USG (n = 18)

Patellar tendon (at the site of the lesion)

All persons, irrespective of group, received the same rehabilitation program (stretching and strengthening [eccentric] for 3 months

VAS (pain intensity); VISA-P (knee function and activities);

No significant adverse

  1. BM-MSC Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, EQ VAS EuroQol VAS, GRoC Global Rating of Change Score, ESWT extracorporeal shock wave therapy, HVIGI high-volume image-guided injection, IKDC International Knee Documentation Committee , LP-PRP leukocyte-poor PRP, LR-PRP leucocyte-rich PRP, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, NS normal saline, PRP platelet-rich plasma, PRS Numeric Pain Rating Scale, PT physio/physical therapy, SF-12 Short Form-12 questionnaire, USG ultrasound guidance, UTC ultrasound tissue characterization, VAS visual analog scale, VISA-P Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment for Pain