Skip to main content

Table 5 Revision rates in percent after 1 year (1 y), 5 years (5 y) and 10 years (10 y) by models reported by arthroplasty registries

From: Implant survivorship, functional outcomes and complications with the use of rotating hinge knee implants: a systematic review

 

EPRD

NJR

FAR

n

1 y

5 y

10 y

n

1 y

5 y

10 y

n

1 y

5 y

10 y

NexGen Rotating Hinge (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA)

591

3.8

N/A

N/A

    

676

4.4

7.9

8.3

Kinematic (Stryker, Kalamazoo, USA)

        

119

3.4

7.9

14.0

Endo-modell (Link, Hamburg, Germany)

    

1278

1.4

5.3

8.7

567

3.2

7.4

12.1

EnduRo (Aesculap, Center Valley, USA)

869

4.0

N/A

N/A

        

Duracon (Stryker, Kalamazoo, USA)

        

554

3.1

8.2

9.1

RT-Plus (Smith&Nephew, Watford, UK)

1101

4.3

N/A

N/A

        

RT-Plus Modular (Smith&Nephew, Watford, UK)

327

4.8

N/A

N/A

        
  1. EPRD Endoprothesenregister Deutschland, NJR National Joint Registry, FAR Finnish Arthroplasty registry, n numbers implanted