Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of complication rates from each study

From: Implant survivorship, functional outcomes and complications with the use of rotating hinge knee implants: a systematic review

Author

Year

Total complications

Reoperation

Joint infection

Periprosthetic fracture

Dislocation

Patellar instability

Aseptic loosening

Prosthesis breakage

Extensor mechanism failure

Neurological injury

Superficial infection

Haematoma

 

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Revision cases

                         

 Rodriguez

2015

1

1%

1

1%

1

1%

 Neumann

2011

1

4%

1

4%

1

4%

 Gudnason

2011

12

29%

12

29%

2

5%

2

5%

1

2%

1

2%

4

10%

1

2%

2

5%

 Pradham

2004

 Bistolfi

2013

19

36%

14

26%

3

6%

1

2%

2

4%

1

2%

6

11%

1

2%

2

4%

 Barrack

2000

4

29%

1

7%

  

1

7%

1

7%

1

7%

 Abdelaziz

2019

13

52%

13

52%

3

12%

1

4%

5

20%

 Back

2008

4

14%

4

14%

3

10%

1

3%

 Baier

2013

19

28%

18

26%

3

4%

1

1%

2

3%

4

6%

 Bistolfi

2012

10

36%

7

25%

2

7%

1

4%

2

7%

2

7%

1

4%

1

4%

 Joshi

2008

18

23%

8

10%

2

3%

3

4%

2

3%

4

5%

3

4%

 Pour

2007

22

50%

19

43%

5

11%

1

2%

4

9%

8

18%

Primary cases

                         

 Yang

2011

7

14%

7

14%

7

14%

 Rahman

2015

1

7%

1

7%

1

7%

 Lozano

2012

25

23%

6

5%

2

2%

11

10%

2

2%

 Kowalczewski

2014

6

50%

3

25%

3

25%

 Petrou

2006

22

22%

4

4%

2

2%

3

3%

1

1%

1

1%

5

5%

 Bistolfi 2

2013

29

30%

20

20%

8

8%

1

1%

5

7%

3

4%

9

13%

3

3%

Leng

2018

3

11%

2

7%

2

7%

1

4%

  1. n number, % percentage of study cohort, – not reported