Skip to main content

Table 3 Frequency that each group achieved the desired target in radiological parameters

From: Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study

  UKA-R UKA-C P*
aMDFA 98 ± 3° 14 (88%) 10 (56%) 0.06
aMPTA 87 ± 3° 13 (81%) 11 (61%) 0.27
Tibial slope 5 ± 3° 15 (94%) 15 (83%) 0.60
Sagittal femoral angle 45 ± 3° 12 (75%) 5 (28%) 0.02+
Correct implant size 16 (100%) 14 (78%) 0.11
  1. UKA-R robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, UKA-C conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, aMDFA anatomical medial distal femoral angle, aMPTA anatomical medial proximal tibial angle
  2. *Fisher’s exact test, + significant difference