Skip to main content

Table 3 Frequency that each group achieved the desired target in radiological parameters

From: Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study

 

UKA-R

UKA-C

P*

aMDFA 98 ± 3°

14 (88%)

10 (56%)

0.06

aMPTA 87 ± 3°

13 (81%)

11 (61%)

0.27

Tibial slope 5 ± 3°

15 (94%)

15 (83%)

0.60

Sagittal femoral angle 45 ± 3°

12 (75%)

5 (28%)

0.02+

Correct implant size

16 (100%)

14 (78%)

0.11

  1. UKA-R robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, UKA-C conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, aMDFA anatomical medial distal femoral angle, aMPTA anatomical medial proximal tibial angle
  2. *Fisher’s exact test, + significant difference
Back to article page

Knee Surgery & Related Research

ISSN: 2234-2451