Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinical and radiological measurements between groups

From: Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study

 

UKA-R

UKA-C

P

BS OKS

17 (6–41) [11–23]

18 (12–30) [15–21]

0.34**

BS Pain NRS

6 (2–10) [5–7]

7 (2–10) [6–8]

0.52**

Lengh of hospital stay (days)

2 (1–4) [2–3]

2 (1–3) [2–2]

0.25**

Surgery time

139 (125–156) [129–72]

106 (85–131) [98–124]

< 0.01**+

Sagital femoral angle

46 (42–57) [44–47]

48 (33–65) [44–53]

0.47**

aMDFA

98 (95–101) [97–99]

101 (96–105) [98–103]

0.02**+

aMPTA

86.9 (83–92) [85–88]

85.3 (81–97) [83–86]

0.26**

Slope

4.4 (1.7–7.0) [3.3–5.1]

5.3 (0.7–10.0) [3.8–6.9]

0.09**

Incorrect size

0 (0%)

4 (22%)

0.07*

Post-operative OKS

45 (37–47) [41–47]

39 (23–48) [37–42]

0.01**+

Post-operative pain NRS

1 (0–3) [0–1]

4 (0–9) [2–6]

< 0.01**+

  1. UKA-R robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, UKA-C conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, BS before surgery, NRS numerical rating scale, aMDFA anatomical medial distal femoral angle, aMPTA anatomical medial proximal tibial angle, OKS Oxford Knee Score
  2. *Fisher’s exact test; **nonparametric test median; + significant difference