Table 2 Current reports on outcome of two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
From: Two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Year | Author | Level of study | Country | No. of case | Mean age (years) | Bone graft | Mean F/U | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | Thomas et al. | III | United Kingdom | 49 | 35.4 | Iliac autobone | 6.2 years | IKDC: 61.2, Objective laxity: 1.36 mm |
2013 | Franceschi et al. | IV | Italy | 30 | 29.1 | Proximal tibia autobone | 6.7 years | Lysholm: 90.2, return to sports: 66.7% |
2016 | Uchida et al. | IV | Japan | 10 | 28.0 | Iliac autobone | Minimum 2 years | Negative instability test, Lysholm: 96.6 |
2017 | Mitchell et al. | III | USA | 49 | 30.4 | The Opteform allograft bone | 3.1 years | Failure rate: 6.1%, Lysholm: 77 |
2018 | Diermeier et al. | III | Germany | 44 | 30.5 | Iliac autobone | 33.9 months | Lysholm: 77.2, IKDC: 69.0, Tegner: 4.1 |